Translating...
authoryamaoka <yamaoka>
Thu, 8 May 2003 12:29:23 +0000 (12:29 +0000)
committeryamaoka <yamaoka>
Thu, 8 May 2003 12:29:23 +0000 (12:29 +0000)
texi/gnus-ja.texi

index acb223c..50727a9 100644 (file)
@@ -21638,12 +21638,12 @@ Spam \e$B%0%k!<%W$G$O!"%G%#%U%)%k%H$G$9$Y$F$N%a%C%;!<%8$,\e(B spam \e$B$G$"$k$H2r<a
 \e$B%U%)%k%H$G$O$=$N%0%k!<%WL>$O\e(B @samp{spam} \e$B$G$9$,!"\e(B
 @code{spam-split-group} \e$B$r%+%9%?%^%$%:$9$k$3$H$,2DG=$G$9!#\e(B
 
-@c TRANSLATEME
-You can also give @code{spam-split} a parameter,
-e.g. @samp{'spam-use-regex-headers}.  Why is this useful?
+\e$B$^$?!"\e(B@code{spam-split} \e$B$K%Q%i%a!<%?!"Nc$(\e(B
+\e$B$P\e(B @samp{spam-use-regex-headers} \e$B$rM?$($k$3$H$b$G$-$^$9!#$J$<$3$l$,M-MQ\e(B
+\e$B$J$N$G$7$g$&$+\e(B?
 
-Take these split rules (with @code{spam-use-regex-headers} and
-@code{spam-use-blackholes} set):
+\e$B$3$l$i$N\e(B (@code{spam-use-regex-headers} \e$B$H\e(B @code{spam-use-blackholes} \e$B$N\e(B
+\e$B@_Dj$K$h$k\e(B) \e$BJ,3d$N5,B'$r8+$F2<$5$$\e(B:
 
 @example
  nnimap-split-fancy '(|
@@ -21653,16 +21653,16 @@ Take these split rules (with @code{spam-use-regex-headers} and
                      "mail")
 @end example
 
-Now, the problem is that you want all ding messages to make it to the
-ding folder.  But that will let obvious spam (for example, spam
-detected by SpamAssassin, and @code{spam-use-regex-headers}) through,
-when it's sent to the ding list.  On the other hand, some messages to
-the ding list are from a mail server in the blackhole list, so the
-invocation of @code{spam-split} can't be before the ding rule.
+\e$B$5$F!"LdBj$O\e(B ding \e$B08$F$N%a%C%;!<%8$r$9$Y$F\e(B ding \e$B%U%)%k%@!<$KF~$l$h$&$H$7\e(B
+\e$B$F$$$k$3$H$G$9!#$G$b$=$l$O\e(B ding \e$B%a!<%j%s%0%j%9%H08$F$KAw$i$l$?\e(B spam (\e$BNc\e(B
+\e$B$($P\e(B SpamAssassin \e$B$H\e(B @code{spam-use-regex-headers} \e$B$K$h$C$F8!=P$5$l\e(B
+\e$B$k\e(B spam) \e$B$r5v$7$F$7$^$&$G$7$g$&!#0lJ}!"$$$/$D$+$N\e(B ding \e$B08$F$N%a%C%;!<%8\e(B
+\e$B$O%V%i%C%/%[!<%k%j%9%H$K:\$C$F$$$k%a!<%k%5!<%P!<$+$i$d$C$FMh$k$N$G!"\e(B
+ding \e$B$N5,B'$h$jA0$K\e(B @code{spam-split} \e$B$rH/F0$9$k$3$H$,$G$-$^$;$s!#\e(B
 
-You can let SpamAssassin headers supercede ding rules, but all other
-@code{spam-split} rules (including a second invocation of the
-regex-headers check) will be after the ding rule:
+SpamAssassin \e$B%X%C%@!<$K\e(B ding \e$B$N5,B'$rCV$-49$($5$;$k$3$H$O$G$-$^$9$,!"B>\e(B
+\e$B$N$9$Y$F$N\e(B @code{spam-split} \e$B$N5,B'\e(B (\e$BBhFs$N@55,I=8=%X%C%@!<8!::$r4^\e(B
+\e$B$`\e(B) \e$B$O\e(B ding \e$B$N5,B'$N8e$K$J$C$F$7$^$&$G$7$g$&!#\e(B
 
 @example
  nnimap-split-fancy '(|
@@ -21673,19 +21673,18 @@ regex-headers check) will be after the ding rule:
                      "mail")
 @end example
 
-Basically, this lets you invoke specific @code{spam-split} checks
-depending on your particular needs.  You don't have to throw all mail
-into all the spam tests.  Another reason why this is nice is that
-messages to mailing lists you have rules for don't have to have
-resource-intensive blackhole checks performed on them.  You could also
-specify different spam checks for your nnmail split vs. your nnimap
-split.  Go crazy.
-
-You still have to have specific checks such as
-@code{spam-use-regex-headers} set to t, even if you specifically
-invoke @code{spam-split} with the check.  The reason is that when
-loading @code{spam.el}, some conditional loading is done depending on
-what @code{spam-use-xyz} variables you have set.
+\e$B4pK\E*$K!"$3$l$OFC$K$"$J$?$NI,MW$K0MB8$7$?FCDj$N\e(B @code{spam-split} \e$B8!\e(B
+\e$B::$r5/F0$5$;$^$9!#$9$Y$F$N%a!<%k$r$9$Y$F$N\e(B spam \e$B%F%9%H$KEj$2$kI,MW$O$"$j\e(B
+\e$B$^$;$s!#$3$l$,NI$$JL$NM}M3$O!"5,B'$r;}$C$F$$$k%a!<%j%s%0%j%9%H$X$N%a%C%;!<\e(B
+\e$B%8$KBP$7$F!";q8;=8LsE*$J%V%i%C%/%[!<%k!&%A%'%C%/$r<B9T$9$kI,MW$,$J$$$H$$\e(B
+\e$B$&$3$H$G$9!#$5$i$K\e(B nnmail \e$BJ,3d$KBP$7$F\e(B nnimap \e$BJ,3d$N$?$a$N!"0[$J$k\e(B spam
+\e$B8!::$r;XDj$9$k$3$H$b$G$-$^$9!#5$$,68$&!<!#\e(B
+
+\e$B8!::$HF1;~$KL@$i$+$K\e(B @code{spam-split} \e$B$r<B9T$9$k$H$7$F$b!":#$^$G$H$*\e(B
+\e$B$j\e(B @code{spam-use-regex-headers} \e$B$r\e(B t \e$B$K@_Dj$9$k$h$&$J8!::$r9T$C$F$$$J$1\e(B
+\e$B$l$P$J$j$^$;$s!#$J$<$J$i\e(B @file{spam.el} \e$B$rFI$_9~$`$H$-$K!"$"$J$?$,2?\e(B
+\e$B$N\e(B @code{spam-use-xyz} \e$BJQ?t$r@_Dj$7$F$$$k$+$K1~$8$?!"$$$/$D$+$N>r7oIU$-\e(B
+\e$B$NFI$_9~$_$,9T$o$l$k$+$i$G$9!#\e(B
 
 @emph{@acronym{IMAP} \e$BMxMQ<T$X$NCm0U\e(B}