From: yamaoka Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:48:49 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Synch with Oort Gnus. X-Git-Tag: t-gnus-6_15_14-00-quimby~26 X-Git-Url: http://git.chise.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0050a5702cb9fedcc3b24f7b78d8f9f51ae0c4af;p=elisp%2Fgnus.git- Synch with Oort Gnus. --- diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog index 5ecde6d..8bd2cd5 100644 --- a/lisp/ChangeLog +++ b/lisp/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,23 @@ +2003-01-15 Teodor Zlatanov + + * spam.el (spam-use-bogofilter-headers, spam-bogofilter-header) + (spam-bogofilter-database-directory): new variables + (spam-check-bogofilter-headers, spam-check-bogofilter) + (spam-bogofilter-register-with-bogofilter) + (spam-bogofilter-register-spam-routine) + (spam-bogofilter-register-ham-routine) + (spam-group-ham-processor-bogofilter-p): new functions for the new + Bogofilter interface + (spam-summary-prepare-exit): use the new Bogofilter functions + (spam-list-of-checks): added spam-use-bogofilter-headers + (gnus-summary-mode-map): removed the spam-bogofilter-score entries + for now + + * gnus.el (gnus-install-group-spam-parameters): new variable, t by + default, in the gnus-start customization group. Used to disable + the spam-*/ham-* parameters. + (gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter): new ham processor + 2003-01-15 Jesper Harder * gnus-xmas.el (gnus-xmas-redefine): Use region-exists-p in @@ -20,12 +40,6 @@ * nnimap.el (nnimap-split-download-body): New variable. (nnimap-split-articles): Use it. -2003-01-15 Teodor Zlatanov - - * gnus.el (gnus-install-group-spam-parameters): new variable, t by - default, in the gnus-start customization group. Used to disable - the spam-*/ham-* parameters. - 2002-01-14 Kevin Greiner * gnus-agent.el (gnus-agent-check-overview-buffer): This data diff --git a/lisp/gnus.el b/lisp/gnus.el index f88f059..0fa78be 100644 --- a/lisp/gnus.el +++ b/lisp/gnus.el @@ -1852,6 +1852,10 @@ Only applicable to spam groups.") "The ifile summary exit ham processor. Only applicable to non-spam (unclassified and ham) groups.") + (defvar gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter "bogofilter-ham" + "The Bogofilter summary exit ham processor. +Only applicable to non-spam (unclassified and ham) groups.") + (defvar gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-stat "stat-ham" "The spam-stat summary exit ham processor. Only applicable to non-spam (unclassified and ham) groups.") @@ -1875,6 +1879,7 @@ Only applicable to non-spam (unclassified and ham) groups.") (variable-item gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-stat) (variable-item gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter) (variable-item gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-blacklist) + (variable-item gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter) (variable-item gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-ifile) (variable-item gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-stat) (variable-item gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-whitelist) @@ -1898,6 +1903,7 @@ for mail groups." (variable-item gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-stat) (variable-item gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter) (variable-item gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-blacklist) + (variable-item gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter) (variable-item gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-ifile) (variable-item gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-stat) (variable-item gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-whitelist) diff --git a/lisp/spam.el b/lisp/spam.el index 6fdd048..6517cf8 100644 --- a/lisp/spam.el +++ b/lisp/spam.el @@ -102,8 +102,15 @@ The regular expression is matched against the address." :type 'boolean :group 'spam) +(defcustom spam-use-bogofilter-headers nil + "Whether bogofilter headers should be used by spam-split. +Enable this if you pre-process messages with Bogofilter BEFORE Gnus sees them." + :type 'boolean + :group 'spam) + (defcustom spam-use-bogofilter nil - "Whether bogofilter should be used by spam-split." + "Whether bogofilter should be invoked by spam-split. +Enable this if you want Gnus to invoke Bogofilter on new messages." :type 'boolean :group 'spam) @@ -199,46 +206,31 @@ your main source of newsgroup names." "Spam bogofilter configuration." :group 'spam) -(defcustom spam-bogofilter-output-buffer-name "*Bogofilter Output*" - "Name of buffer when displaying `bogofilter -v' output." - :type 'string - :group 'spam-bogofilter) - -(defcustom spam-bogofilter-initial-timeout 40 - "Timeout in seconds for the initial reply from the `bogofilter' program." - :type 'integer - :group 'spam-bogofilter) - -(defcustom spam-bogofilter-subsequent-timeout 15 - "Timeout in seconds for any subsequent reply from the `bogofilter' program." - :type 'integer - :group 'spam-bogofilter) - (defcustom spam-bogofilter-path (exec-installed-p "bogofilter") "File path of the Bogofilter executable program." :type '(choice (file :tag "Location of bogofilter") (const :tag "Bogofilter is not installed")) :group 'spam-bogofilter) -;; FIXME! In the following regexp, we should explain which tool produces -;; which kind of header. I do not even remember them all by now. X-Junk -;; (and previously X-NoSpam) are produced by the `NoSpam' tool, which has -;; never been published, so it might not be reasonable leaving it in the -;; list. -(defcustom spam-bogofilter-spaminfo-header-regexp - "^X-\\(jf\\|Junk\\|NoSpam\\|Spam\\|SB\\)[^:]*:" - "Regexp for spam markups in headers. -Markup from spam recognisers, as well as `Xref', are to be removed from -articles before they get registered by Bogofilter." - :type 'regexp +(defcustom spam-bogofilter-header "X-Bogosity" + "The header that Bogofilter inserts in messages." + :type 'string :group 'spam-bogofilter) +(defcustom spam-bogofilter-database-directory nil + "Directory path of the Bogofilter databases." + :type '(choice (directory :tag "Location of the Bogofilter database directory") + (const :tag "Use the default")) + :group 'spam-ifile) + ;;; Key bindings for spam control. (gnus-define-keys gnus-summary-mode-map - "St" spam-bogofilter-score +;;; bogofilter scores don't work yet +;;; "St" spam-bogofilter-score "Sx" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam - "Mst" spam-bogofilter-score +;;; bogofilter scores don't work yet +;;; "Mst" spam-bogofilter-score "Msx" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam "\M-d" gnus-summary-mark-as-spam) @@ -281,6 +273,9 @@ articles before they get registered by Bogofilter." (defun spam-group-ham-processor-ifile-p (group) (spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-ifile)) +(defun spam-group-ham-processor-bogofilter-p (group) + (spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-ifile)) + (defun spam-group-spam-processor-stat-p (group) (spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-stat)) @@ -304,7 +299,7 @@ articles before they get registered by Bogofilter." ;; The spam processors are invoked for any group, spam or ham or neither (when (and spam-bogofilter-path (spam-group-spam-processor-bogofilter-p gnus-newsgroup-name)) - (spam-bogofilter-register-routine)) + (spam-bogofilter-register-spam-routine)) (when (and spam-ifile-path (spam-group-spam-processor-ifile-p gnus-newsgroup-name)) @@ -332,6 +327,8 @@ articles before they get registered by Bogofilter." (spam-whitelist-register-routine)) (when (spam-group-ham-processor-ifile-p gnus-newsgroup-name) (spam-ifile-register-ham-routine)) + (when (spam-group-ham-processor-bogofilter-p gnus-newsgroup-name) + (spam-bogofilter-register-ham-routine)) (when (spam-group-ham-processor-stat-p gnus-newsgroup-name) (spam-stat-register-ham-routine)) (when (spam-group-ham-processor-BBDB-p gnus-newsgroup-name) @@ -441,13 +438,14 @@ articles before they get registered by Bogofilter." ;;;; Spam determination. (defvar spam-list-of-checks - '((spam-use-blacklist . spam-check-blacklist) - (spam-use-whitelist . spam-check-whitelist) - (spam-use-BBDB . spam-check-BBDB) - (spam-use-ifile . spam-check-ifile) - (spam-use-stat . spam-check-stat) - (spam-use-blackholes . spam-check-blackholes) - (spam-use-bogofilter . spam-check-bogofilter)) + '((spam-use-blacklist . spam-check-blacklist) + (spam-use-whitelist . spam-check-whitelist) + (spam-use-BBDB . spam-check-BBDB) + (spam-use-ifile . spam-check-ifile) + (spam-use-stat . spam-check-stat) + (spam-use-blackholes . spam-check-blackholes) + (spam-use-bogofilter-headers . spam-check-bogofilter-headers) + (spam-use-bogofilter . spam-check-bogofilter)) "The spam-list-of-checks list contains pairs associating a parameter variable with a spam checking function. If the parameter variable is true, then the checking function is called, and its value decides what @@ -767,225 +765,60 @@ Uses `gnus-newsgroup-name' if category is nil (for ham registration)." ;;;; Bogofilter -;;; See Paul Graham article, at `http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html'. - -;;; This page is for those wanting to control spam with the help of -;;; Eric Raymond's speedy Bogofilter, see -;;; http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/bogofilter. This has been tested with -;;; a locally patched copy of version 0.4. - -;;; Make sure Bogofilter is installed. Bogofilter internally uses -;;; Judy fast associative arrays, so you need to install Judy first, -;;; and Bogofilter next. Fetch both distributions by visiting the -;;; following links and downloading the latest version of each: -;;; -;;; http://sourceforge.net/projects/judy/ -;;; http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/bogofilter/ -;;; -;;; Unpack the Judy distribution and enter its main directory. Then do: -;;; -;;; ./configure -;;; make -;;; make install -;;; -;;; You will likely need to become super-user for the last step. -;;; Then, unpack the Bogofilter distribution and enter its main -;;; directory: -;;; -;;; make -;;; make install -;;; -;;; Here as well, you need to become super-user for the last step. -;;; Now, initialize your word lists by doing, under your own identity: -;;; -;;; mkdir ~/.bogofilter -;;; touch ~/.bogofilter/badlist -;;; touch ~/.bogofilter/goodlist -;;; -;;; These two files are text files you may edit, but you normally don't! - -;;; The `M-d' command gets added to Gnus summary mode, marking current -;;; article as spam, showing it with the `H' mark. Whenever you see a -;;; spam article, make sure to mark its summary line with `M-d' before -;;; leaving the group. Some groups, as per variable -;;; `spam-junk-mailgroups' below, receive articles from Gnus splitting -;;; on clues added by spam recognisers, so for these groups, we tack -;;; an `H' mark at group entry for all summary lines which would -;;; otherwise have no other mark. Make sure to _remove_ `H' marks for -;;; any article which is _not_ genuine spam, before leaving such -;;; groups: you may use `M-u' to "unread" the article, or `d' for -;;; declaring it read the non-spam way. When you leave a group, all -;;; `H' marked articles, saved or unsaved, are sent to Bogofilter -;;; which will study them as spam samples. - -;;; Messages may also be deleted in various other ways, and unless -;;; `spam-ham-marks-form' gets overridden below, marks `R' and `r' for -;;; default read or explicit delete, marks `X' and 'K' for automatic -;;; or explicit kills, as well as mark `Y' for low scores, are all -;;; considered to be associated with articles which are not spam. -;;; This assumption might be false, in particular if you use kill -;;; files or score files as means for detecting genuine spam, you -;;; should then adjust `spam-ham-marks-form'. When you leave a group, -;;; all _unsaved_ articles bearing any the above marks are sent to -;;; Bogofilter which will study these as not-spam samples. If you -;;; explicit kill a lot, you might sometimes end up with articles -;;; marked `K' which you never saw, and which might accidentally -;;; contain spam. Best is to make sure that real spam is marked with -;;; `H', and nothing else. - -;;; All other marks do not contribute to Bogofilter pre-conditioning. -;;; In particular, ticked, dormant or souped articles are likely to -;;; contribute later, when they will get deleted for real, so there is -;;; no need to use them prematurely. Explicitly expired articles do -;;; not contribute, command `E' is a way to get rid of an article -;;; without Bogofilter ever seeing it. - -;;; In a word, with a minimum of care for associating the `H' mark for -;;; spam articles only, Bogofilter training all gets fairly automatic. -;;; You should do this until you get a few hundreds of articles in -;;; each category, spam or not. The shell command `head -1 -;;; ~/.bogofilter/*' shows both article counts. The command `S S' in -;;; summary mode, either for debugging or for curiosity, triggers -;;; Bogofilter into displaying in another buffer the "spamicity" score -;;; of the current article (between 0.0 and 1.0), together with the -;;; article words which most significantly contribute to the score. - -;;; The real way for using Bogofilter, however, is to have some use -;;; tool like `procmail' for invoking it on message reception, then -;;; adding some recognisable header in case of detected spam. Gnus -;;; splitting rules might later trip on these added headers and react -;;; by sorting such articles into specific junk folders as per -;;; `spam-junk-mailgroups'. Here is a possible `.procmailrc' contents -;;; (still untested -- please tell me how it goes): -;;; -;;; :0HBf: -;;; * ? bogofilter -;;; | formail -bfI "X-Spam-Status: Yes" +(defun spam-check-bogofilter-headers () + (let ((header (message-fetch-field spam-bogofilter-header))) + (if (and header + (string-match "^Yes" header)) + spam-split-group + nil))) + (defun spam-check-bogofilter () - ;; Dynamic spam check. I do not know how to check the exit status, - ;; so instead, read `bogofilter -v' output. - (when (and spam-use-bogofilter spam-bogofilter-path) - (spam-bogofilter-articles nil "-v" (list (gnus-summary-article-number))) - (when (save-excursion - (set-buffer spam-bogofilter-output-buffer-name) - (goto-char (point-min)) - (re-search-forward "Spamicity: \\(0\\.9\\|1\\.0\\)" nil t)) - spam-split-group))) - -(defun spam-bogofilter-score () - "Use `bogofilter -v' on the current article. -This yields the 15 most discriminant words for this article and the -spamicity coefficient of each, and the overall article spamicity." - (interactive) - (when (and spam-use-bogofilter spam-bogofilter-path) - (spam-bogofilter-articles nil "-v" (list (gnus-summary-article-number))) - (with-current-buffer spam-bogofilter-output-buffer-name - (unless (zerop (buffer-size)) - (if (<= (count-lines (point-min) (point-max)) 1) - (progn - (goto-char (point-max)) - (when (bolp) - (backward-char 1)) - (message "%s" (buffer-substring (point-min) (point)))) - (goto-char (point-min)) - (display-buffer (current-buffer))))))) - -(defun spam-bogofilter-register-routine () - (let ((articles gnus-newsgroup-articles) - article mark ham-articles spam-articles spam-mark-values - ham-mark-values) - - ;; marks are stored as symbolic values, so we have to dereference - ;; them for memq to work we wouldn't have to do this if - ;; gnus-summary-article-mark returned a symbol. - (dolist (mark spam-ham-marks) - (push (symbol-value mark) ham-mark-values)) + "Check the Bogofilter backend for the classification of this message" + (let ((article-buffer-name (buffer-name)) + return bogorun) + (with-temp-buffer + (let ((temp-buffer-name (buffer-name))) + (save-excursion + (set-buffer article-buffer-name) + (if spam-bogofilter-database-directory + (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) + spam-bogofilter-path + nil temp-buffer-name nil "-v" + "-d" spam-bogofilter-database-directory) + (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) spam-bogofilter-path + nil temp-buffer-name nil "-v"))) + (when (spam-check-bogofilter-headers) + (setq return spam-split-group)))) + return)) - (dolist (mark spam-spam-marks) - (push (symbol-value mark) spam-mark-values)) +(defun spam-bogofilter-register-with-bogofilter (article-string spam) + "Register an article, given as a string, as spam or non-spam." + (when (stringp article-string) + (let ((switch (if spam "-s" "-n"))) + (with-temp-buffer + (insert-string article-string) + (if spam-bogofilter-database-directory + (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) + spam-bogofilter-path + nil nil nil "-v" switch + "-d" spam-bogofilter-database-directory) + (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) spam-bogofilter-path + nil nil nil "-v" switch)))))) + +(defun spam-bogofilter-register-spam-routine () + (spam-generic-register-routine + (lambda (article) + (spam-bogofilter-register-with-bogofilter + (spam-get-article-as-string article) t)) + nil)) - (while articles - (setq article (pop articles) - mark (gnus-summary-article-mark article)) - (cond ((memq mark spam-mark-values) (push article spam-articles)) - ((memq article gnus-newsgroup-saved)) - ((memq mark ham-mark-values) (push article ham-articles)))) - (when ham-articles - (spam-bogofilter-articles "ham" "-n" ham-articles)) - (when spam-articles - (spam-bogofilter-articles "SPAM" "-s" spam-articles)))) - -(defun spam-bogofilter-articles (type option articles) - (let ((output-buffer (get-buffer-create spam-bogofilter-output-buffer-name)) - (article-copy (get-buffer-create " *Bogofilter Article Copy*")) - (remove-regexp (concat spam-bogofilter-spaminfo-header-regexp - "\\|Xref:")) - (counter 0) - prefix process article) - (when type - (setq prefix (format "Studying %d articles as %s..." (length articles) - type)) - (message "%s" prefix)) - (save-excursion (set-buffer output-buffer) (erase-buffer)) - (setq process (start-process "bogofilter" output-buffer - spam-bogofilter-path "-F" option)) - (process-kill-without-query process t) - (unwind-protect - (save-window-excursion - (while articles - (setq counter (1+ counter)) - (when prefix - (message "%s %d" prefix counter)) - (setq article (pop articles)) - (gnus-summary-goto-subject article) - (gnus-summary-show-article t) - (gnus-eval-in-buffer-window article-copy - (insert-buffer-substring gnus-original-article-buffer) - ;; Remove spam classification redundant headers: they may induce - ;; unwanted biases in later analysis. - (message-remove-header remove-regexp t) - ;; Bogofilter really wants From envelopes for counting articles. - ;; Fake one at the beginning, make sure there will be no other. - (goto-char (point-min)) - (if (looking-at "From ") - (forward-line 1) - (insert "From nobody " (current-time-string) "\n")) - (let (case-fold-search) - (while (re-search-forward "^From " nil t) - (beginning-of-line) - (insert ">"))) - (process-send-region process (point-min) (point-max)) - (erase-buffer)))) - ;; Sending the EOF is unwind-protected. This is to prevent lost copies - ;; of `bogofilter', hung on reading their standard input, in case the - ;; whole registering process gets interrupted by the user. - (process-send-eof process)) - (kill-buffer article-copy) - ;; Receive process output. It sadly seems that we still have to protect - ;; ourselves against hung `bogofilter' processes. - (let ((status (process-status process)) - (timeout (* 1000 spam-bogofilter-initial-timeout)) - (quanta 200)) ; also counted in milliseconds - (while (and (not (eq status 'exit)) (> timeout 0)) - ;; `accept-process-output' timeout is counted in microseconds. - (setq timeout (if (accept-process-output process 0 (* 1000 quanta)) - (* 1000 spam-bogofilter-subsequent-timeout) - (- timeout quanta)) - status (process-status process))) - (if (eq status 'exit) - (when prefix - (message "%s done!" prefix)) - ;; Sigh! The process did time out... Become brutal! - (interrupt-process process) - (message "%s %d INTERRUPTED! (Article %d, status %s)" - (or prefix "Bogofilter process...") - counter article status) - ;; Give some time for user to read. Sitting redisplays but gives up - ;; if input is pending. Sleeping does not give up, but it does not - ;; redisplay either. Mix both: let's redisplay and not give up. - (sit-for 1) - (sleep-for 3))))) +(defun spam-bogofilter-register-ham-routine () + (spam-generic-register-routine + nil + (lambda (article) + (spam-bogofilter-register-with-bogofilter + (spam-get-article-as-string article) nil)))) (provide 'spam)