strictly speaking redundant now that `setf' exists. Many
programmers continue to prefer `setq' for setting simple
variables, though, purely for stylistic or historical reasons.
- The macro `(setf x y)' actually expands to `(setq x y)', so
+ The form `(setf x y)' actually expands to `(setq x y)', so
there is no performance penalty for using it in compiled code.
* A call to any of the following Lisp functions: