(require 'gnus-uu) ; because of key prefix issues
(require 'gnus) ; for the definitions of group content classification and spam processors
-
-;; FIXME! We should not require `message' until we actually need
-;; them. Best would be to declare needed functions as auto-loadable.
-(require 'message)
-
-;; Attempt to load BBDB macros
-(eval-when-compile
- (condition-case nil
- (require 'bbdb-com)
- (file-error (defalias 'bbdb-search 'ignore))))
+(require 'message) ;for the message-fetch-field functions
;; autoload executable-find
(eval-and-compile
;; executable-find is not autoloaded in Emacs 20
(autoload 'executable-find "executable"))
-;; autoload ifile-spam-filter
-(eval-and-compile
- (autoload 'ifile-spam-filter "ifile-gnus"))
-
;; autoload query-dig
(eval-and-compile
(autoload 'query-dig "dig"))
:type 'directory
:group 'spam)
+(defcustom spam-move-spam-nonspam-groups-only t
+ "Whether spam should be moved in non-spam groups only.
+When nil, only ham and unclassified groups will have their spam moved
+to the spam-process-destination. When t, spam will also be moved from
+spam groups."
+ :type 'boolean
+ :group 'spam-ifile)
+
(defcustom spam-whitelist (expand-file-name "whitelist" spam-directory)
"The location of the whitelist.
The file format is one regular expression per line.
:type 'boolean
:group 'spam)
+(defcustom spam-use-stat nil
+ "Whether spam-stat should be used by spam-split."
+ :type 'boolean
+ :group 'spam)
+
(defcustom spam-split-group "spam"
"Group name where incoming spam should be put by spam-split."
:type 'string
:group 'spam)
-;; FIXME! The mailgroup list evidently depends on other choices made by the
-;; user, so the built-in default below is not likely to be appropriate.
(defcustom spam-junk-mailgroups (cons spam-split-group '("mail.junk" "poste.pourriel"))
"Mailgroups with spam contents.
All unmarked article in such group receive the spam mark on group entry."
:type '(repeat (string :tag "Group"))
:group 'spam)
-(defcustom spam-blackhole-servers '("bl.spamcop.net" "relays.ordb.org" "dev.null.dk" "relays.visi.com")
+(defcustom spam-blackhole-servers '("bl.spamcop.net" "relays.ordb.org"
+ "dev.null.dk" "relays.visi.com")
"List of blackhole servers."
:type '(repeat (string :tag "Server"))
:group 'spam)
-(defcustom spam-ham-marks (list 'gnus-del-mark 'gnus-read-mark 'gnus-killed-mark 'gnus-kill-file-mark 'gnus-low-score-mark)
+(defcustom spam-ham-marks (list 'gnus-del-mark 'gnus-read-mark
+ 'gnus-killed-mark 'gnus-kill-file-mark
+ 'gnus-low-score-mark)
"Marks considered as being ham (positively not spam).
Such articles will be processed as ham (non-spam) on group exit."
:type '(set
:type 'face
:group 'spam)
+(defgroup spam-ifile nil
+ "Spam ifile configuration."
+ :group 'spam)
+
+(defcustom spam-ifile-path (executable-find "ifile")
+ "File path of the ifile executable program."
+ :type '(choice (file :tag "Location of ifile")
+ (const :tag "ifile is not installed"))
+ :group 'spam-ifile)
+
+(defcustom spam-ifile-database-path nil
+ "File path of the ifile database."
+ :type '(choice (file :tag "Location of the ifile database")
+ (const :tag "Use the default"))
+ :group 'spam-ifile)
+
+(defcustom spam-ifile-spam-category "spam"
+ "Name of the spam ifile category."
+ :type 'string
+ :group 'spam-ifile)
+
+(defcustom spam-ifile-all-categories nil
+ "Whether the ifile check will return all categories, or just spam.
+Set this to t if you want to use the spam-split invocation of ifile as
+your main source of newsgroup names."
+ :type 'boolean
+ :group 'spam-ifile)
+
(defgroup spam-bogofilter nil
"Spam bogofilter configuration."
:group 'spam)
;; (and previously X-NoSpam) are produced by the `NoSpam' tool, which has
;; never been published, so it might not be reasonable leaving it in the
;; list.
-(defcustom spam-bogofilter-spaminfo-header-regexp "^X-\\(jf\\|Junk\\|NoSpam\\|Spam\\|SB\\)[^:]*:"
+(defcustom spam-bogofilter-spaminfo-header-regexp
+ "^X-\\(jf\\|Junk\\|NoSpam\\|Spam\\|SB\\)[^:]*:"
"Regexp for spam markups in headers.
Markup from spam recognisers, as well as `Xref', are to be removed from
articles before they get registered by Bogofilter."
(defun spam-group-spam-contents-p (group)
(if (stringp group)
(or (member group spam-junk-mailgroups)
- (memq 'gnus-group-spam-classification-spam (gnus-parameter-spam-contents group)))
+ (memq 'gnus-group-spam-classification-spam
+ (gnus-parameter-spam-contents group)))
nil))
(defun spam-group-ham-contents-p (group)
(if (stringp group)
- (memq 'gnus-group-spam-classification-ham (gnus-parameter-spam-contents group))
+ (memq 'gnus-group-spam-classification-ham
+ (gnus-parameter-spam-contents group))
nil))
(defun spam-group-processor-p (group processor)
(member processor (car (gnus-parameter-spam-process group)))
nil))
-(defun spam-group-processor-bogofilter-p (group)
+(defun spam-group-spam-processor-bogofilter-p (group)
(spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter))
-(defun spam-group-processor-ifile-p (group)
+(defun spam-group-spam-processor-blacklist-p (group)
+ (spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-blacklist))
+
+(defun spam-group-spam-processor-ifile-p (group)
(spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-ifile))
-(defun spam-group-processor-blacklist-p (group)
- (spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-blacklist))
+(defun spam-group-ham-processor-ifile-p (group)
+ (spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-ifile))
+
+(defun spam-group-spam-processor-stat-p (group)
+ (spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-stat))
-(defun spam-group-processor-whitelist-p (group)
+(defun spam-group-ham-processor-stat-p (group)
+ (spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-stat))
+
+(defun spam-group-ham-processor-whitelist-p (group)
(spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-whitelist))
-(defun spam-group-processor-BBDB-p (group)
+(defun spam-group-ham-processor-BBDB-p (group)
(spam-group-processor-p group 'gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-BBDB))
-;;; Hooks dispatching. A bit raw for now.
+;;; Summary entry and exit processing.
(defun spam-summary-prepare ()
(spam-mark-junk-as-spam-routine))
+(add-hook 'gnus-summary-prepare-hook 'spam-summary-prepare)
+
(defun spam-summary-prepare-exit ()
;; The spam processors are invoked for any group, spam or ham or neither
(when (and spam-bogofilter-path
- (spam-group-processor-bogofilter-p gnus-newsgroup-name))
+ (spam-group-spam-processor-bogofilter-p gnus-newsgroup-name))
(spam-bogofilter-register-routine))
- (when (spam-group-processor-ifile-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
- (spam-ifile-register-routine))
+ (when (and spam-ifile-path
+ (spam-group-spam-processor-ifile-p gnus-newsgroup-name))
+ (spam-ifile-register-spam-routine))
- (when (spam-group-processor-bogofilter-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
+ (when (spam-group-spam-processor-stat-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
+ (spam-stat-register-spam-routine))
+
+ (when (spam-group-spam-processor-bogofilter-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
(spam-blacklist-register-routine))
- ;; Only for spam groups, we expire and maybe move articles
- (when (spam-group-spam-contents-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
- (spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine (gnus-parameter-spam-process-destination gnus-newsgroup-name)))
+ (if spam-move-spam-nonspam-groups-only
+ (when (not (spam-group-spam-contents-p gnus-newsgroup-name))
+ (spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine
+ (gnus-parameter-spam-process-destination gnus-newsgroup-name)))
+ (spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine
+ (gnus-parameter-spam-process-destination gnus-newsgroup-name)))
+
+ ;; now we redo spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine to only
+ ;; expire spam, in case the above did not expire them
+ (spam-mark-spam-as-expired-and-move-routine nil)
(when (spam-group-ham-contents-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
- (when (spam-group-processor-whitelist-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
+ (when (spam-group-ham-processor-whitelist-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
(spam-whitelist-register-routine))
- (when (spam-group-processor-BBDB-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
- (spam-BBDB-register-routine))))
+ (when (spam-group-ham-processor-ifile-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
+ (spam-ifile-register-ham-routine))
+ (when (spam-group-ham-processor-stat-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
+ (spam-stat-register-ham-routine))
+ (when (spam-group-ham-processor-BBDB-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
+ (spam-BBDB-register-routine)))
+
+ ;; now move all ham articles out of spam groups
+ (when (spam-group-spam-contents-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
+ (spam-ham-move-routine
+ (gnus-parameter-ham-process-destination gnus-newsgroup-name))))
-(add-hook 'gnus-summary-prepare-hook 'spam-summary-prepare)
(add-hook 'gnus-summary-prepare-exit-hook 'spam-summary-prepare-exit)
(defun spam-mark-junk-as-spam-routine ()
- ;; check the global list of group names spam-junk-mailgroups and the group parameters
+ ;; check the global list of group names spam-junk-mailgroups and the
+ ;; group parameters
(when (spam-group-spam-contents-p gnus-newsgroup-name)
(let ((articles gnus-newsgroup-articles)
article)
(let ((gnus-current-article article))
(gnus-summary-move-article nil group)))))))
+(defun spam-ham-move-routine (&optional group)
+ (let ((articles gnus-newsgroup-articles)
+ article ham-mark-values mark)
+ (dolist (mark spam-ham-marks)
+ (push (symbol-value mark) ham-mark-values))
+
+ (while articles
+ (setq article (pop articles))
+ (when (and (memq mark ham-mark-values)
+ (stringp group))
+ (let ((gnus-current-article article))
+ (gnus-summary-move-article nil group))))))
+
(defun spam-generic-register-routine (spam-func ham-func)
(let ((articles gnus-newsgroup-articles)
- article mark ham-articles spam-articles spam-mark-values ham-mark-values)
+ article mark ham-articles spam-articles spam-mark-values
+ ham-mark-values)
- ;; marks are stored as symbolic values, so we have to dereference them for memq to work
- ;; we wouldn't have to do this if gnus-summary-article-mark returned a symbol.
+ ;; marks are stored as symbolic values, so we have to dereference
+ ;; them for memq to work. we wouldn't have to do this if
+ ;; gnus-summary-article-mark returned a symbol.
(dolist (mark spam-ham-marks)
(push (symbol-value mark) ham-mark-values))
((memq article gnus-newsgroup-saved))
((memq mark ham-mark-values) (push article ham-articles))))
(when (and ham-articles ham-func)
- (mapc ham-func ham-articles)) ; we use mapc because unlike mapcar it discards the return values
+ (mapc ham-func ham-articles)) ; we use mapc because unlike
+ ; mapcar it discards the
+ ; return values
(when (and spam-articles spam-func)
- (mapc spam-func spam-articles)))) ; we use mapc because unlike mapcar it discards the return values
+ (mapc spam-func spam-articles)))) ; we use mapc because unlike
+ ; mapcar it discards the
+ ; return values
+
+(eval-and-compile
+ (defalias 'spam-point-at-eol (if (fboundp 'point-at-eol)
+ 'point-at-eol
+ 'line-end-position)))
+
+(defun spam-get-article-as-string (article)
+ (let ((article-string))
+ (when (numberp article)
+ (save-window-excursion
+ (gnus-summary-goto-subject article)
+ (gnus-summary-show-article t)
+ (set-buffer gnus-article-buffer)
+ (setq article-string (buffer-string))))
+ article-string))
(defun spam-fetch-field-from-fast (article)
- "Fetch the `from' field quickly, using the Gnus internal gnus-data-list function"
+ "Fetch the `from' field quickly, using the internal gnus-data-list function"
(if (and (numberp article)
(assoc article (gnus-data-list nil)))
(mail-header-from (gnus-data-header (assoc article (gnus-data-list nil))))
nil))
+(defun spam-fetch-field-subject-fast (article)
+ "Fetch the `subject' field quickly, using the internal gnus-data-list function"
+ (if (and (numberp article)
+ (assoc article (gnus-data-list nil)))
+ (mail-header-subject (gnus-data-header (assoc article (gnus-data-list nil))))
+ nil))
+
\f
;;;; Spam determination.
(spam-use-whitelist . spam-check-whitelist)
(spam-use-BBDB . spam-check-BBDB)
(spam-use-ifile . spam-check-ifile)
+ (spam-use-stat . spam-check-stat)
(spam-use-blackholes . spam-check-blackholes)
(spam-use-bogofilter . spam-check-bogofilter))
"The spam-list-of-checks list contains pairs associating a parameter
See the Info node `(gnus)Fancy Mail Splitting' for more details."
(interactive)
+
+ ;; load the spam-stat tables if needed
+ (when spam-use-stat (spam-stat-load))
(let ((list-of-checks spam-list-of-checks)
decision)
(if spam-use-dig
(let ((query-result (query-dig query-string)))
(when query-result
- (message "spam detected with blackhole check of relay %s (dig query result '%s')" query-string query-result)
+ (message "spam: positive blackhole check '%s'" query-result)
(push (list ip server query-result)
matches)))
;; else, if not using dig.el
(when matches
spam-split-group)))
\f
-;;;; BBDB
-;;; original idea for spam-check-BBDB from Alexander Kotelnikov <sacha@giotto.sj.ru>
+;;;; BBDB
+
+;;; original idea for spam-check-BBDB from Alexander Kotelnikov
+;;; <sacha@giotto.sj.ru>
;; all this is done inside a condition-case to trap errors
+
(condition-case nil
(progn
-
+ (require 'bbdb)
(require 'bbdb-com)
-
- (defun spam-enter-ham-BBDB (from)
- "Enter an address into the BBDB; implies ham (non-spam) sender"
- (when (stringp from)
- (let* ((parsed-address (gnus-extract-address-components from))
- (name (or (car parsed-address) "Ham Sender"))
- (net-address (car (cdr parsed-address))))
- (message "Adding address %s to BBDB" from)
- (when (and net-address
- (not (bbdb-search (bbdb-records) nil nil net-address)))
- (bbdb-create-internal name nil net-address nil nil "ham sender added by spam.el")))))
-
- (defun spam-BBDB-register-routine ()
- (spam-generic-register-routine
- ;; spam function
- nil
- ;; ham function
- (lambda (article)
- (spam-enter-ham-BBDB (spam-fetch-field-from-fast article)))))
-
- (defun spam-check-BBDB ()
- "Mail from people in the BBDB is never considered spam"
- (let ((who (message-fetch-field "from")))
- (when who
- (setq who (regexp-quote (cadr (gnus-extract-address-components who))))
- (if (bbdb-search (bbdb-records) nil nil who) nil spam-split-group)))))
+
+ (defun spam-enter-ham-BBDB (from)
+ "Enter an address into the BBDB; implies ham (non-spam) sender"
+ (when (stringp from)
+ (let* ((parsed-address (gnus-extract-address-components from))
+ (name (or (car parsed-address) "Ham Sender"))
+ (net-address (car (cdr parsed-address))))
+ (message "Adding address %s to BBDB" from)
+ (when (and net-address
+ (not (bbdb-search-simple nil net-address)))
+ (bbdb-create-internal name nil net-address nil nil
+ "ham sender added by spam.el")))))
+
+ (defun spam-BBDB-register-routine ()
+ (spam-generic-register-routine
+ ;; spam function
+ nil
+ ;; ham function
+ (lambda (article)
+ (spam-enter-ham-BBDB (spam-fetch-field-from-fast article)))))
+
+ (defun spam-check-BBDB ()
+ "Mail from people in the BBDB is never considered spam"
+ (let ((who (message-fetch-field "from")))
+ (when who
+ (setq who (regexp-quote (cadr
+ (gnus-extract-address-components who))))
+ (if (bbdb-search-simple nil who)
+ nil spam-split-group)))))
(file-error (progn
- (setq spam-list-of-checks
- (delete (assoc 'spam-use-BBDB spam-list-of-checks)
- spam-list-of-checks))
- (defun spam-check-BBDB ()
- message "spam-check-BBDB was invoked, but it shouldn't have")
- (defun spam-BBDB-register-routine ()
- (spam-generic-register-routine nil nil)))))
+ (defalias 'bbdb-search-simple 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-check-BBDB 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-BBDB-register-routine 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-enter-ham-BBDB 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'bbdb-create-internal 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'bbdb-records 'ignore))))
\f
;;;; ifile
-;;; uses ifile-gnus.el from http://www.ai.mit.edu/people/jhbrown/ifile-gnus.html
-;;; check the ifile backend; return nil if the mail was NOT classified as spam
-;;; TODO: we can't (require 'ifile-gnus), because it will insinuate itself automatically
+
+;;; check the ifile backend; return nil if the mail was NOT classified
+;;; as spam
+
+(defun spam-get-ifile-database-parameter ()
+ "Get the command-line parameter for ifile's database from spam-ifile-database-path."
+ (if spam-ifile-database-path
+ (format "--db-file=%s" spam-ifile-database-path)
+ nil))
+
(defun spam-check-ifile ()
- (let ((ifile-primary-spam-group spam-split-group))
- (ifile-spam-filter nil)))
+ "Check the ifile backend for the classification of this message"
+ (let ((article-buffer-name (buffer-name))
+ category return)
+ (with-temp-buffer
+ (let ((temp-buffer-name (buffer-name))
+ (db-param (spam-get-ifile-database-parameter)))
+ (save-excursion
+ (set-buffer article-buffer-name)
+ (if db-param
+ (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) spam-ifile-path
+ nil temp-buffer-name nil "-q" "-c" db-param)
+ (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) spam-ifile-path
+ nil temp-buffer-name nil "-q" "-c")))
+ (goto-char (point-min))
+ (if (not (eobp))
+ (setq category (buffer-substring (point) (spam-point-at-eol))))
+ (when (not (zerop (length category))) ; we need a category here
+ (if spam-ifile-all-categories
+ (setq return category)
+ ;; else, if spam-ifile-all-categories is not set...
+ (when (string-equal spam-ifile-spam-category category)
+ (setq return spam-split-group))))))
+ return))
+
+(defun spam-ifile-register-with-ifile (article-string category)
+ "Register an article, given as a string, with a category.
+Uses `gnus-newsgroup-name' if category is nil (for ham registration)."
+ (when (stringp article-string)
+ (let ((category (or category gnus-newsgroup-name))
+ (db-param (spam-get-ifile-database-parameter)))
+ (with-temp-buffer
+ (insert-string article-string)
+ (if db-param
+ (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) spam-ifile-path
+ nil nil nil
+ "-h" "-i" category db-param)
+ (call-process-region (point-min) (point-max) spam-ifile-path
+ nil nil nil
+ "-h" "-i" category))))))
+
+(defun spam-ifile-register-spam-routine ()
+ (spam-generic-register-routine
+ (lambda (article)
+ (spam-ifile-register-with-ifile
+ (spam-get-article-as-string article) spam-ifile-spam-category))
+ nil))
-;; TODO: add ifile registration
-;; We need ifile-gnus.el to support nnimap; we could feel the message
-;; directly to ifile like we do with bogofilter but that's ugly.
-(defun spam-ifile-register-routine ()
- (spam-generic-register-routine nil nil))
+(defun spam-ifile-register-ham-routine ()
+ (spam-generic-register-routine
+ nil
+ (lambda (article)
+ (spam-ifile-register-with-ifile
+ (spam-get-article-as-string article) nil))))
\f
+;;;; spam-stat
+
+(condition-case nil
+ (progn
+ (let ((spam-stat-install-hooks nil))
+ (require 'spam-stat))
+
+ (defun spam-check-stat ()
+ "Check the spam-stat backend for the classification of this message"
+ (let ((spam-stat-split-fancy-spam-group spam-split-group) ; override
+ (spam-stat-buffer (buffer-name)) ; stat the current buffer
+ category return)
+ (spam-stat-split-fancy)))
+
+ (defun spam-stat-register-spam-routine ()
+ (spam-generic-register-routine
+ (lambda (article)
+ (let ((article-string (spam-get-article-as-string article)))
+ (with-temp-buffer
+ (insert-string article-string)
+ (spam-stat-buffer-is-spam))))
+ nil)
+ (spam-stat-save))
+
+ (defun spam-stat-register-ham-routine ()
+ (spam-generic-register-routine
+ nil
+ (lambda (article)
+ (let ((article-string (spam-get-article-as-string article)))
+ (with-temp-buffer
+ (insert-string article-string)
+ (spam-stat-buffer-is-non-spam)))))
+ (spam-stat-save)))
+
+ (file-error (progn
+ (defalias 'spam-stat-register-ham-routine 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-stat-register-spam-routine 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-stat-buffer-is-spam 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-stat-buffer-is-non-spam 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-stat-split-fancy 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-stat-load 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-stat-save 'ignore)
+ (defalias 'spam-check-stat 'ignore))))
+
+\f
+
;;;; Blacklists and whitelists.
(defvar spam-whitelist-cache nil)
(setq spam-blacklist-cache (spam-parse-list spam-blacklist)))
(and (spam-from-listed-p spam-blacklist-cache) spam-split-group))
-(eval-and-compile
- (defalias 'spam-point-at-eol (if (fboundp 'point-at-eol)
- 'point-at-eol
- 'line-end-position)))
-
(defun spam-parse-list (file)
(when (file-readable-p file)
(let (contents address)
;;; See Paul Graham article, at `http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html'.
-;;; This page is for those wanting to control spam with the help of Eric
-;;; Raymond's speedy Bogofilter, see http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/bogofilter.
-;;; This has been tested with a locally patched copy of version 0.4.
+;;; This page is for those wanting to control spam with the help of
+;;; Eric Raymond's speedy Bogofilter, see
+;;; http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/bogofilter. This has been tested with
+;;; a locally patched copy of version 0.4.
-;;; Make sure Bogofilter is installed. Bogofilter internally uses Judy fast
-;;; associative arrays, so you need to install Judy first, and Bogofilter
-;;; next. Fetch both distributions by visiting the following links and
-;;; downloading the latest version of each:
+;;; Make sure Bogofilter is installed. Bogofilter internally uses
+;;; Judy fast associative arrays, so you need to install Judy first,
+;;; and Bogofilter next. Fetch both distributions by visiting the
+;;; following links and downloading the latest version of each:
;;;
;;; http://sourceforge.net/projects/judy/
;;; http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/bogofilter/
;;; make
;;; make install
;;;
-;;; You will likely need to become super-user for the last step. Then, unpack
-;;; the Bogofilter distribution and enter its main directory:
+;;; You will likely need to become super-user for the last step.
+;;; Then, unpack the Bogofilter distribution and enter its main
+;;; directory:
;;;
;;; make
;;; make install
;;;
-;;; Here as well, you need to become super-user for the last step. Now,
-;;; initialize your word lists by doing, under your own identity:
+;;; Here as well, you need to become super-user for the last step.
+;;; Now, initialize your word lists by doing, under your own identity:
;;;
;;; mkdir ~/.bogofilter
;;; touch ~/.bogofilter/badlist
;;;
;;; These two files are text files you may edit, but you normally don't!
-;;; The `M-d' command gets added to Gnus summary mode, marking current article
-;;; as spam, showing it with the `H' mark. Whenever you see a spam article,
-;;; make sure to mark its summary line with `M-d' before leaving the group.
-;;; Some groups, as per variable `spam-junk-mailgroups' below, receive articles
-;;; from Gnus splitting on clues added by spam recognisers, so for these
-;;; groups, we tack an `H' mark at group entry for all summary lines which
-;;; would otherwise have no other mark. Make sure to _remove_ `H' marks for
-;;; any article which is _not_ genuine spam, before leaving such groups: you
-;;; may use `M-u' to "unread" the article, or `d' for declaring it read the
-;;; non-spam way. When you leave a group, all `H' marked articles, saved or
-;;; unsaved, are sent to Bogofilter which will study them as spam samples.
+;;; The `M-d' command gets added to Gnus summary mode, marking current
+;;; article as spam, showing it with the `H' mark. Whenever you see a
+;;; spam article, make sure to mark its summary line with `M-d' before
+;;; leaving the group. Some groups, as per variable
+;;; `spam-junk-mailgroups' below, receive articles from Gnus splitting
+;;; on clues added by spam recognisers, so for these groups, we tack
+;;; an `H' mark at group entry for all summary lines which would
+;;; otherwise have no other mark. Make sure to _remove_ `H' marks for
+;;; any article which is _not_ genuine spam, before leaving such
+;;; groups: you may use `M-u' to "unread" the article, or `d' for
+;;; declaring it read the non-spam way. When you leave a group, all
+;;; `H' marked articles, saved or unsaved, are sent to Bogofilter
+;;; which will study them as spam samples.
;;; Messages may also be deleted in various other ways, and unless
-;;; `spam-ham-marks-form' gets overridden below, marks `R' and `r' for default
-;;; read or explicit delete, marks `X' and 'K' for automatic or explicit
-;;; kills, as well as mark `Y' for low scores, are all considered to be
-;;; associated with articles which are not spam. This assumption might be
-;;; false, in particular if you use kill files or score files as means for
-;;; detecting genuine spam, you should then adjust `spam-ham-marks-form'. When
-;;; you leave a group, all _unsaved_ articles bearing any the above marks are
-;;; sent to Bogofilter which will study these as not-spam samples. If you
-;;; explicit kill a lot, you might sometimes end up with articles marked `K'
-;;; which you never saw, and which might accidentally contain spam. Best is
-;;; to make sure that real spam is marked with `H', and nothing else.
-
-;;; All other marks do not contribute to Bogofilter pre-conditioning. In
-;;; particular, ticked, dormant or souped articles are likely to contribute
-;;; later, when they will get deleted for real, so there is no need to use
-;;; them prematurely. Explicitly expired articles do not contribute, command
-;;; `E' is a way to get rid of an article without Bogofilter ever seeing it.
-
-;;; In a word, with a minimum of care for associating the `H' mark for spam
-;;; articles only, Bogofilter training all gets fairly automatic. You should
-;;; do this until you get a few hundreds of articles in each category, spam
-;;; or not. The shell command `head -1 ~/.bogofilter/*' shows both article
-;;; counts. The command `S S' in summary mode, either for debugging or for
-;;; curiosity, triggers Bogofilter into displaying in another buffer the
-;;; "spamicity" score of the current article (between 0.0 and 1.0), together
-;;; with the article words which most significantly contribute to the score.
-
-;;; The real way for using Bogofilter, however, is to have some use tool like
-;;; `procmail' for invoking it on message reception, then adding some
-;;; recognisable header in case of detected spam. Gnus splitting rules might
-;;; later trip on these added headers and react by sorting such articles into
-;;; specific junk folders as per `spam-junk-mailgroups'. Here is a possible
-;;; `.procmailrc' contents (still untested -- please tell me how it goes):
+;;; `spam-ham-marks-form' gets overridden below, marks `R' and `r' for
+;;; default read or explicit delete, marks `X' and 'K' for automatic
+;;; or explicit kills, as well as mark `Y' for low scores, are all
+;;; considered to be associated with articles which are not spam.
+;;; This assumption might be false, in particular if you use kill
+;;; files or score files as means for detecting genuine spam, you
+;;; should then adjust `spam-ham-marks-form'. When you leave a group,
+;;; all _unsaved_ articles bearing any the above marks are sent to
+;;; Bogofilter which will study these as not-spam samples. If you
+;;; explicit kill a lot, you might sometimes end up with articles
+;;; marked `K' which you never saw, and which might accidentally
+;;; contain spam. Best is to make sure that real spam is marked with
+;;; `H', and nothing else.
+
+;;; All other marks do not contribute to Bogofilter pre-conditioning.
+;;; In particular, ticked, dormant or souped articles are likely to
+;;; contribute later, when they will get deleted for real, so there is
+;;; no need to use them prematurely. Explicitly expired articles do
+;;; not contribute, command `E' is a way to get rid of an article
+;;; without Bogofilter ever seeing it.
+
+;;; In a word, with a minimum of care for associating the `H' mark for
+;;; spam articles only, Bogofilter training all gets fairly automatic.
+;;; You should do this until you get a few hundreds of articles in
+;;; each category, spam or not. The shell command `head -1
+;;; ~/.bogofilter/*' shows both article counts. The command `S S' in
+;;; summary mode, either for debugging or for curiosity, triggers
+;;; Bogofilter into displaying in another buffer the "spamicity" score
+;;; of the current article (between 0.0 and 1.0), together with the
+;;; article words which most significantly contribute to the score.
+
+;;; The real way for using Bogofilter, however, is to have some use
+;;; tool like `procmail' for invoking it on message reception, then
+;;; adding some recognisable header in case of detected spam. Gnus
+;;; splitting rules might later trip on these added headers and react
+;;; by sorting such articles into specific junk folders as per
+;;; `spam-junk-mailgroups'. Here is a possible `.procmailrc' contents
+;;; (still untested -- please tell me how it goes):
;;;
;;; :0HBf:
;;; * ? bogofilter
(defun spam-bogofilter-register-routine ()
(let ((articles gnus-newsgroup-articles)
- article mark ham-articles spam-articles spam-mark-values ham-mark-values)
+ article mark ham-articles spam-articles spam-mark-values
+ ham-mark-values)
- ;; marks are stored as symbolic values, so we have to dereference them for memq to work
- ;; we wouldn't have to do this if gnus-summary-article-mark returned a symbol.
+ ;; marks are stored as symbolic values, so we have to dereference
+ ;; them for memq to work we wouldn't have to do this if
+ ;; gnus-summary-article-mark returned a symbol.
(dolist (mark spam-ham-marks)
(push (symbol-value mark) ham-mark-values))
(defun spam-bogofilter-articles (type option articles)
(let ((output-buffer (get-buffer-create spam-bogofilter-output-buffer-name))
(article-copy (get-buffer-create " *Bogofilter Article Copy*"))
- (remove-regexp (concat spam-bogofilter-spaminfo-header-regexp "\\|Xref:"))
+ (remove-regexp (concat spam-bogofilter-spaminfo-header-regexp
+ "\\|Xref:"))
(counter 0)
prefix process article)
(when type
projects / elisp / gnus.git- / blobdiff