It is an order of magnitude faster than the proper abbrev_match(),
but then again, vi is an order of magnitude faster than Emacs.
- This speed difference should be unnoticable, though. I have tested
+ This speed difference should be unnoticeable, though. I have tested
the degenerated cases of thousands of abbrevs being defined, and
abbrev_match() was still fast enough for normal operation. */
static struct Lisp_Symbol *
because of consistency with abbrev_match. */
if (wordend < point)
return 0;
- if (wordend <= wordstart)
- return 0;
}
+ if (wordend <= wordstart)
+ return 0;
+
p = word = (Bufbyte *) alloca (MAX_EMCHAR_LEN * (wordend - wordstart));
for (idx = wordstart; idx < wordend; idx++)
{