returned as a result of this analysis.
@menu
-* Dissection:: Analyzing a @sc{mime} message.
-* Handles:: Handle manipulations.
-* Display:: Displaying handles.
+* Dissection:: Analyzing a @sc{mime} message.
+* Handles:: Handle manipulations.
+* Display:: Displaying handles.
+* Customization:: Variables that affect display.
@end menu
@end table
+@node Customization
+@section Customization
+
+@table @code
+
+@item mm-inline-media-tests
+This is an alist where the key is a @sc{mime} type, the second element
+is a function to display the part @dfn{inline} (i.e., inside Emacs), and
+the third element is a form to be @code{eval}ed to say whether the part
+can be displayed inline.
+
+This variable specifies whether a part @emph{can} be displayed inline,
+and, if so, how to do it. It does not say whether parts are
+@emph{actually} displayed inline.
+
+@item mm-inlines-types
+This, on the other hand, says what types are to be displayed inline, if
+they satisfy the conditions set by the variable above. It's a list of
+@sc{mime} media types.
+
+@item mm-automatic-display
+This is a list of types that are to be displayed ``automatically'', but
+only if the above variable allows it. That is, only inlinable parts are
+usually displayed automatically, but in the end, this is up to the
+display agent that's using the @sc{mime} library.
+
+@item mm-attachment-override-types
+Some @sc{mime} agents create parts that have a content-disposition of
+@samp{attachment}. This variable allows overriding that disposition and
+displaying the part inline.
+
+@item mm-discouraged-alternatives
+List of @sc{mime} types that are discouraged when viewing
+@samp{multipart/alternative}. Viewing agents are supposed to view the
+last possible part of a message, as that is supposed to be the richest.
+However, users may prefer other types instead, and this list says what
+types are most unwanted. If, for instance, @samp{text/html} parts are
+very unwanted, and @samp{text/richtech} parts are somewhat unwanted,
+then the value of this variable should be set to:
+
+@lisp
+("text/html" "text/richtext")
+@end lisp
+
+@item mm-all-images-fit
+If non-@code{nil}, all images will be deemed to fit into the buffer,
+even when they don't.
+
+@end table
+
+
+
@node Composing
@chapter Composing
@cindex Composing
* Simple MML Example:: An example MML document.
* MML Definition:: All valid MML elements.
* Advanced MML Example:: Another example MML document.
+* Conversion:: Going from @sc{mime} to MML and vice versa.
@end menu
@end example
+@node Conversion
+@section Conversion
+
+@findex mime-to-mml
+A (multipart) @sc{mime} message can be converted to MML with the
+@code{mime-to-mml} function. It works on the message in the current
+buffer, and substitutes MML markup for @sc{mime} boundaries.
+Non-textual parts do not have their contents in the buffer, but instead
+have the contents in separate buffers that are referred to from the MML
+tags.
+
+@findex mml-to-mime
+An MML message can be converted back to @sc{mime} by the
+@code{mml-to-mime} function.
+
+These functions are in certain senses ``lossy''---you will not get back
+an identical message if you run @sc{mime-to-mml} and then
+@sc{mml-to-mime}. Not only will trivial things like the order of the
+headers differ, but the contents of the headers may also be different.
+For instance, the original message may use base64 encoding on text,
+while @sc{mml-to-mime} may decide to use quoted-printable encoding, and
+so on.
+
+In essence, however, these two functions should be the inverse of each
+other. The resulting contents of the message should remain equivalent,
+if not identical.
+
@node Standards
@chapter Standards