+2005-01-06 Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>
+
+ * message.texi (Reply): `message-reply-to-function' should return
+ a list. Suggested by ARISAWA Akihiro <ari@mbf.ocn.co.jp>.
+
2005-01-05 Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org>
* Makefile.in (.texi): Use LC_ALL instead of LANG.
\e$B$3$N4X?t$O$=$l$,JVEz$7$h$&$H$9$k5-;v$N%X%C%@!<ItJ,$K8BDj$5$l$?HO0O$G8F$P\e(B
\e$B$l$^$9!#\e(B
-\e$B$4Mw$NDL$j!"$3$N4X?t$O$=$l$,\e(B To \e$B%X%C%@!<$,$I$N$h$&$G$"$k$Y$-$+$K4V$9$k<g\e(B
-\e$BD%$,$"$l$P!"J8;zNs$rJV$9$Y$-$G$9!#$b$7$=$&$G$J$1$l$P!"$=$l$O\e(B @code{nil}
-\e$B$rJV$9$@$1$G!"$=$&$9$l$P\e(B To \e$B%X%C%@!<$r7hDj$9$kIaDL$NJ}K!$,;H$o$l$k$G$7$g\e(B
-\e$B$&!#\e(B
-
-\e$B$3$N4X?t$O%j%9%H$rJV$9;v$b$G$-$^$9!#$=$N$h$&$J>l9g$O!"$=$l$>$l$NMWAG\e(B
-\e$B$O\e(B cons \e$B%;%k$G$"$k$Y$-$G!"$=$l$N\e(B @sc{car} \e$B$O%X%C%@!<$NL>\e(B
-\e$BA0\e(B (\e$BNc\e(B @code{Cc}) \e$B$G!"\e(B@sc{cdr} \e$B$,%X%C%@!<$N\e(B
-\e$BCM\e(B (\e$BNc\e(B @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}) \e$B$G$"$k$Y$-$G$9!#$9$Y$F$N$3$l$i$N%X%C%@!<\e(B
-\e$B$O=P$F9T$/%a!<%k$N%X%C%@!<$KA^F~$5$l$^$9!#\e(B
+\e$B$4Mw$NDL$j!"$3$N4X?t$O%j%9%H$rJV$5$J$1$l$P$J$j$^$;$s!#$3$N>l9g!"\e(BTo \e$B%X%C\e(B
+\e$B%@!<$,$=$&$J$k$Y$-$@$HH=CG$5$l$l$P\e(B @code{((To . "Whom"))} \e$B$rJV$7$^$9!#$b\e(B
+\e$B$7$=$&$G$J$1$l$P!"$=$l$O\e(B @code{nil} \e$B$rJV$9$@$1$G!"$=$&$9$l$P\e(B To \e$B%X%C%@!<\e(B
+\e$B$r7hDj$9$kIaDL$NJ}K!$,;H$o$l$k$G$7$g$&!#\e(B
+
+\e$B%j%9%H$N$=$l$>$l$NMWAG$O\e(B cons \e$B%;%k$G!"\e(B@sc{car} \e$B$O%X%C%@!<$NL>\e(B
+\e$BA0\e(B (\e$BNc\e(B @code{Cc})\e$B!"\e(B@sc{cdr} \e$B$O%X%C%@!<$N\e(B
+\e$BCM\e(B (\e$BNc\e(B @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}) \e$B$G$9!#$3$l$i$9$Y$F$N%X%C%@!<$O=P$F9T$/\e(B
+\e$B%a!<%k$N%X%C%@!<$KA^F~$5$l$^$9!#\e(B
@node Wide Reply
@section \e$B9-$/JVEz\e(B
This function will be called narrowed to the head of the article that is
being replied to.
-As you can see, this function should return a string if it has an
-opinion as to what the To header should be. If it does not, it should
-just return @code{nil}, and the normal methods for determining the To
-header will be used.
-
-This function can also return a list. In that case, each list element
-should be a cons, where the @sc{car} should be the name of a header
-(e.g. @code{Cc}) and the @sc{cdr} should be the header value
-(e.g. @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}). All these headers will be inserted into
-the head of the outgoing mail.
+As you can see, this function should return a list. In this case, it
+returns @code{((To . "Whom"))} if it has an opinion as to what the To
+header should be. If it does not, it should just return @code{nil}, and
+the normal methods for determining the To header will be used.
+
+Each list element should be a cons, where the @sc{car} should be the
+name of a header (e.g. @code{Cc}) and the @sc{cdr} should be the header
+value (e.g. @samp{larsi@@ifi.uio.no}). All these headers will be
+inserted into the head of the outgoing mail.
@node Wide Reply