From: yamaoka <yamaoka>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 03:22:23 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Translate.
X-Git-Tag: t-gnus-6_17_4-quimby-~1149
X-Git-Url: http://git.chise.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=afe5682351879051f012441575c3e9b8f6412327;p=elisp%2Fgnus.git-

Translate.
---

diff --git a/texi/gnus-ja.texi b/texi/gnus-ja.texi
index cd728de..254cd89 100644
--- a/texi/gnus-ja.texi
+++ b/texi/gnus-ja.texi
@@ -22098,105 +22098,109 @@ Ham $B$,(B spam $B%0%k!<%W$+$i0\F0$5$l$kA0$K0u$r>C$7$?$$>l9g$O!"$3$NJQ?t$r%;%
 @cindex spam configuration examples
 @cindex spam
 
-@subsubheading Ted's setup
+@subsubheading Ted $B$N@_Dj(B
 
 From Ted Zlatanov <tzz@@lifelogs.com>.
 @example
 
-;; for gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent and spam autodetection
-;; see gnus-registry.el for more information
+;; gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent $B$H(B spam $B$N<+F08!CN$N$?$a!#(B
+;; $B>\:Y$O(B gnus-registry.el $B$r;2>H!#(B
 (gnus-registry-initialize)
 (spam-initialize)
 
-;; I like control-S for marking spam
+;; $B;d$O(B spam $B0u$rIU$1$k$N$K(B control-S $B$r9%$`!#(B
 (define-key gnus-summary-mode-map "\C-s" 'gnus-summary-mark-as-spam)
 
 (setq
- spam-log-to-registry t ;; for spam autodetection
+ spam-log-to-registry t ;; Spam $B$N<+F08!CN$N$?$a!#(B
  spam-use-BBDB t
- spam-use-regex-headers t               ; catch X-Spam-Flag (SpamAssassin)
- ;; all groups with "spam" in the name contain spam
+ spam-use-regex-headers t ;; X-Spam-Flag (SpamAssassin) $B$r$D$+$^$($k!#(B
+ ;; $BL>A0$K(B "spam" $B$r4^$`$9$Y$F$N%0%k!<%W$K$O(B spam $B5-;v$,$"$k!#(B
  gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents '(("spam" gnus-group-spam-classification-spam))
- ;; see documentation for these
+ ;; $B$3$l$i$N(B docstring $B$r;2>H!#(B
  spam-move-spam-nonspam-groups-only nil
  spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam t
  spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group t
  nnimap-split-rule 'nnimap-split-fancy
- ;; understand what this does before you copy it to your own setup!
+ ;; $B$"$J$?$N@_Dj$KDI2C$9$kA0$K!"$3$l$,2?$r$9$k$+M}2r$;$h(B!
  nnimap-split-fancy '(|
-                      ;; trace references to parents and put in their group
+                      ;; References $B$r?F$^$GC)$C$F$=$l$i$N%0%k!<%W$rF~$l$k!#(B
                       (: gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent)
-                      ;; this will catch server-side SpamAssassin tags
+                      ;; $B$3$l$O%5!<%P!<B&$N(B SpamAssassin $B%?%0$r$D$+$^$($k!#(B
                       (: spam-split 'spam-use-regex-headers)
                       (any "ding" "ding")
-                      ;; note that spam by default will go to "spam"
+                      ;; Spam $B5-;v$O%G%#%U%)%k%H$G(B "spam" $B$K9T$/$3$H$KCm0U!#(B
                       (: spam-split)
+                      ;; $B%G%#%U%)%k%H$N%a!<%k%\%C%/%9!#(B
                       ;; default mailbox
                       "mail"))
 
-;; my parameters, set with `G p'
+;; `G p' $B$G@_Dj$7$?;d$N%Q%i%a!<%?!#(B
 
-;; all nnml groups, and all nnimap groups except
-;; "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:train" and
-;; "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:spam": any spam goes to nnimap training,
-;; because it must have been detected manually
+;; $B$9$Y$F$N(B nnml $B%0%k!<%W$H!"(B"nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:train"
+;; $B$H(B "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:spam" $B$r=|$$$?$9$Y$F$N(B nnimap
+;; $B%0%k!<%W$G$O!"$I$N(B spam $B$b(B nnimap $B%H%l!<%K%s%0$K9T$/!#(B
+;; $B$=$l$O<jF0$G8!CN$7$J$1$l$P$J$i$J$$$+$i!#(B
 
 ((spam-process-destination . "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:train"))
 
-;; all NNTP groups
-;; autodetect spam with the blacklist and ham with the BBDB
+;; $B$9$Y$F$N(B NNTP $B%0%k!<%W!#(B
+;; Spam $B$r(B blacklist $B$G!"(Bham $B$r(B BBDB $B$G<+F08!CN!#(B
 ((spam-autodetect-methods spam-use-blacklist spam-use-BBDB)
-;; send all spam to the training group
+;; $B$9$Y$F$N(B spam $B$r%H%l!<%K%s%0%0%k!<%W$KAw$k!#(B
  (spam-process-destination . "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:train"))
 
-;; only some NNTP groups, where I want to autodetect spam
+;; $B;d$,(B spam $B$r<+F08!CN$5$;$?$$!"$$$/$D$+$N(B NNTP $B%0%k!<%W!#(B
 ((spam-autodetect . t))
 
-;; my nnimap "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:spam" group
+;; $B;d$N(B nnimap "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:spam" $B%0%k!<%W!#(B
 
-;; this is a spam group
+;; $B$3$l$O(B spam $B%0%k!<%W!#(B
 ((spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-spam)
 
- ;; any spam (which happens when I enter for all unseen messages,
- ;; because of the gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents setting above), goes to
- ;; "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:train" unless I mark it as ham
+ ;; $B$I$s$J(B spam $B$b;d$O(B ham $B0u$rIU$1$J$1$l$P(B
+ ;; "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:train" $B$K9T$/(B ($BA0=R$N(B
+ ;; gnus-spam-newsgroup-contents $B@_Dj$K$h$j!"$9$Y$F$N$^$@FI$^$l$?$3$H(B
+ ;; $B$,L5$$%a%C%;!<%8$rFI$`$H$=$&$J$k(B)$B!#(B
 
  (spam-process-destination "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:train")
 
- ;; any ham goes to my "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:mail" folder, but
- ;; also to my "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:trainham" folder for training
+ ;; $B$I$s$J(B ham $B$b;d$N(B "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:mail" $B%U%)%k%@$K9T$/(B
+ ;; $B$,!";d$N(B "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:trainham" $B%U%)%k%@$K$b%H%l!<(B
+ ;; $B%K%s%0$N$?$a$K9T$/!#(B
 
- (ham-process-destination "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:mail" 
+ (ham-process-destination "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:mail"
                           "nnimap+mail.lifelogs.com:trainham")
- ;; in this group, only '!' marks are ham
+ ;; $B$3$N%0%k!<%W$G$O(B '!' $B0u$,IU$$$F$$$k$b$N$@$1$,(B ham$B!#(B
  (ham-marks
   (gnus-ticked-mark))
- ;; remembers senders in the blacklist on the way out - this is
- ;; definitely not needed, it just makes me feel better
+ ;; $B=P$+$1$k4V:]$K(B blacklist $B$KAw?.<T$r3P$($5$;$k(B - $B$3$l$OL@$i$+$K(B
+ ;; $BITMW$G!"C1$K;d$N]5J0$r@2$i$9$?$a$K$"$j$^$9!#(B
  (spam-process (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-blacklist)))
 
-;; Later, on the IMAP server I use the "train" group for training
-;; SpamAssassin to recognize spam, and the "trainham" group for
-;; recognizing ham - but Gnus has nothing to do with it.
+;; $B$=$N8e(B IMAP $B%5!<%P!<>e$G!";d$O(B SpamAssassin $B$,(B spam $B$rG'<1$9$k(B
+;; $B%H%l!<%K%s%0$N$?$a$K(B "train" $B%0%k!<%W$r!"(Bham $B$rG'<1$9$k%H%l!<(B
+;; $B%K%s%0$N$?$a$K(B "trainham" $B%0%k!<%W$r;H$$$^$9!#$G$b(B Gnus $B$O$=$&(B
+;; $B$$$&$3$H$O$d$C$F$/$l$^$;$s!#(B
 
 @end example
 
-@subsubheading Using @file{spam.el} on an IMAP server with a statistical filter on the server
+@subsubheading $B%5!<%P!<>e$N(B IMAP $B%5!<%P!<$G!"E}7WE*$J_I2a4o$H(B @file{spam.el} $B$r;H$&(B
 
 From Reiner Steib <reiner.steib@@gmx.de>.
 
-My provider has set up bogofilter (in combination with @acronym{DCC}) on
-the mail server (@acronym{IMAP}).  Recognized spam goes to
-@samp{spam.detected}, the rest goes through the normal filter rules,
-i.e. to @samp{some.folder} or to @samp{INBOX}.  Training on false
-positives or negatives is done by copying or moving the article to
-@samp{training.ham} or @samp{training.spam} respectively.  A cron job on
-the server feeds those to bogofilter with the suitable ham or spam
-options and deletes them from the @samp{training.ham} and
-@samp{training.spam} folders.
+$B;d$N%W%m%P%$%@$O(B (@acronym{IMAP}) $B%a!<%k%5!<%P!<>e$G(B (@acronym{DCC} $B$HO"(B
+$B78$7$?(B) bogofilter $B$r2TF/$5$;$F$$$^$9!#G'<1$5$l(B
+$B$?(B spam $B$O(B @samp{spam.detected} $B$X9T$-!";D$j$K$ODL>o$N_I2a5,B'$,E,MQ$5$l(B
+$B$k!"(B $B$9$J$o$A(B @samp{some.folder} $B$+(B @samp{INBOX} $B$K9T$-$^$9!#9NDj$N<:GT(B
+$B$"$k$$$OH]Dj$N%H%l!<%K%s%0$O!"(B@samp{training.ham} $B$^$?(B
+$B$O(B @samp{training.spam} $B$=$l$>$l$K5-;v$r%3%T!<$9$k$+0\F0$5$;$k$3$H$K$h$C(B
+$B$F9T$J$o$l$^$9!#%5!<%P!<>e$N(B cron $B%8%g%V$,!"$=$l$i$rE,@Z$J(B ham $B$^$?(B
+$B$O(B spam $B%*%W%7%g%s$H$H$b$K(B bogofilter $B$KM?$(!"(B@samp{training.ham} $B$*$h(B
+$B$S(B @samp{training.spam} $B%U%)%k%@$+$i$=$l$i$r:o=|$7$^$9!#(B
 
-With the following entries in @code{gnus-parameters}, @code{spam.el}
-does most of the job for me:
+$B0J2<$N(B @code{gnus-parameters} $B$N9`$K$h$C$F!"(B@code{spam.el} $B$O$[$H$s$I$N(B
+$B;E;v$r;d$N$?$a$K$3$J$7$^$9(B:
 
 @lisp
    ("nnimap:spam\\.detected"
@@ -22208,55 +22212,56 @@ does most of the job for me:
     (spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-ham))
 @end lisp
 
-@itemize 
+@itemize
 
 @item @b{The Spam folder:}
 
-In the folder @samp{spam.detected}, I have to check for false positives
-(i.e. legitimate mails, that were wrongly judged as spam by
-bogofilter or DCC).
-
-Because of the @code{gnus-group-spam-classification-spam} entry, all
-messages are marked as spam (with @code{$}).  When I find a false
-positive, I mark the message with some other ham mark (@code{ham-marks},
-@ref{Spam ELisp Package Global Variables}).  On group exit, those
-messages are copied to both groups, @samp{INBOX} (were I want to have
-the article) and @samp{training.ham} (for training bogofilter) and
-deleted from the @samp{spam.detected} folder.
-
-The @code{gnus-article-sort-by-chars} entry simplifies detection of
-false positives for me.  I receive lots of worms (sweN, @dots{}), that all
-have a similar size.  Grouping them by size (i.e. chars) makes finding
-other false positives easier.  (Of course worms aren't @i{spam}
-(@acronym{UCE}, @acronym{UBE}) strictly speaking.  Anyhow, bogofilter is
-an excellent tool for filtering those unwanted mails for me.)
+@samp{spam.detected} $B%U%)%k%@$K$*$$$F!";d$O9NDj$N<:GT(B ($B$9$J$o$A!"(B
+bogofilter $B$+(B DCC $B$,(B spam $B$G$"$k$H8m$C$FH=Dj$7$?@5Ev$J%a!<%k(B) $B$N%A%'%C%/(B
+$B$r$7$J$1$l$P$J$j$^$;$s!#(B
+
+@code{gnus-group-spam-classification-spam} $B$N9`$N$?$a$K!"$9$Y$F$N%a%C%;!<(B
+$B%8$K$O(B spam $B$N0u(B (@code{$}) $B$,IU$1$i$l$^$9!#9NDj$K<:GT$7$?$b$N$r8+$D$1$?(B
+$B$i!";d$O5-;v$K$$$/$D$+$NB>$N(B ham $B0u(B (@code{ham-marks}, @ref{Spam ELisp
+Package Global Variables}) $B$rIU$1$^$9!#%0%k!<%W$r=P$k$H$-!"$=$l$i$N5-;v(B
+$B$O(B @samp{INBOX} ($B;d$,5-;v$rCV$$$F$*$-$?$$$H$3(B
+$B$m(B) $B$H(B @samp{training.ham} (bogofilter $B$N%H%l!<%K%s%0MQ(B) $B$NN>J}$N%0%k!<(B
+$B%W$K%3%T!<$5$l!"(B@samp{spam.detected} $B%U%)%k%@$+$i:o=|$5$l$^$9!#(B
+
+@code{gnus-article-sort-by-chars} $B$N9`$O!";d$N<:GT$7$?9NDj$N8!CN$rC1=c$K(B
+$B$7$^$9!#;d$O!"$9$Y$F;w$?%5%$%:$N!"$?$/$5$s$N%o!<%`(B (sweN, @dots{}) $B$r<u(B
+$B$1<h$j$^$9!#$=$l$i$r%5%$%:(B ($B$D$^$jJ8;z?t(B) $B$G$^$H$a$k$H!"B>$N4V0c$C$?9NDj(B
+$B$r8+$D$1$d$9$/$J$k$N$G$9!#(B($B$b$A$m$s87L)$K$O%o!<%`$O(B @i{spam}
+(@acronym{UCE}, @acronym{UBE}) $B$G$O$"$j$^$;$s!#$H$b$"$l!"$=$l$i$NMW$i$J(B
+$B$$%a!<%k$r_I2a$9$k$N$K(B bogofilter $B$O;d$K$H$C$FM%=($JF;6q$G$9!#(B)
 
 @item @b{Ham folders:}
 
-In my ham folders, I just hit @kbd{S x}
-(@code{gnus-summary-mark-as-spam}) whenever I see an unrecognized spam
-mail (false negative).  On group exit, those messages are moved to
-@samp{training.ham}.
+$B;d$N(B ham $B%U%)%k%@$G!"G'<1$5$l$J$+$C$?(B spam $B%a!<%k(B ($BH]Dj$N<:GT(B) $B$r8+$?$H(B
+$B$-$O$$$D$G$b!";d$OC1$K(B @kbd{S x} (@code{gnus-summary-mark-as-spam}) $B$rC!(B
+$B$-$^$9!#%0%k!<%W$r=P$k$H$-!"$=$l$i$N%a%C%;!<%8$O(B @samp{training.ham} $B$K(B
+$B0\$5$l$^$9!#(B
 @end itemize
 
-@subsubheading Reporting spam articles in Gmane groups with @code{spam-report.el}
+@subsubheading @code{spam-report.el} $B$G(B Gmane $B%0%k!<%W$N(B spam $B$rJs9p$9$k(B
 
 From Reiner Steib <reiner.steib@@gmx.de>.
 
-With following entry in @code{gnus-parameters}, @kbd{S x}
-(@code{gnus-summary-mark-as-spam}) marks articles in @code{gmane.*}
-groups as spam and reports the to Gmane at group exit:
+$B0J2<$N(B @code{gnus-parameters} $B$KG<$a$?9`L\$K$h$C$F!"(B@kbd{S x}
+(@code{gnus-summary-mark-as-spam}) $B$G(B @code{gmane.*} $B%0%k!<%W$N(B spam $B5-(B
+$B;v$K0u$rIU$1!"%0%k!<%W$r=P$k$H$-$K(B Gmane $B$KJs9p$7$^$9(B:
 
 @lisp
    ("^gmane\\."
     (spam-process (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-report-gmane)))
 @end lisp
 
-Additionally, I use @code{(setq spam-report-gmane-use-article-number nil)}
-because I don't read the groups directly from news.gmane.org, but
-through my local news server (leafnode).  I.e. the article numbers are
-not the same as on news.gmane.org, thus @code{spam-report.el} has to check
-the @code{X-Report-Spam} header to find the correct number.
+$B2C$($F!";d$O(B news.gmane.org $B$+$i$G$O$J$/%m!<%+%k%K%e!<%9%5!<(B
+$B%P!<(B (leafnode) $B$rDL$7$F5-;v$rFI$s$G$$$k$N$G!"(B
+@code{(setq spam-report-gmane-use-article-number nil)} $B$r;H$C$F$$$^$9!#(B
+$B$D$^$j!"5-;vHV9f$,(B news.gmane.org $B$K$*$1$k$b$N$H0[$J$k$N$G!"@5$7$$5-;vHV(B
+$B9f$r8+$D$1$k$?$a$K(B @code{spam-report.el} $B$K(B @code{X-Report-Spam} $B%X%C%@!<(B
+$B$r8!::$5$;$J$1$l$P$J$j$^$;$s!#(B
 
 @node Blacklists and Whitelists
 @subsubsection $B%V%i%C%/%j%9%H$H%[%o%$%H%j%9%H(B