import xemacs-21.2.37

[chise/xemacs-chise.git.1] / lisp / custom.el

diff --git a/lisp/custom.el b/lisp/custom.el
index 20f02ab..5cd137d 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/custom.el
+++ b/lisp/custom.el
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ LOAD should be either a library file name, or a feature name."
 
 Define a theme labeled by SYMBOL THEME. The optional argument DOC is a
 doc string describing the theme. It is optionally followed by the
 
 Define a theme labeled by SYMBOL THEME. The optional argument DOC is a
 doc string describing the theme. It is optionally followed by the

-following keyboard arguments
+following keyword arguments

 
 :short-description DESC
       DESC is a short (one line) description of the theme. If not given DOC
 
 :short-description DESC
       DESC is a short (one line) description of the theme. If not given DOC

@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ following keyboard arguments
   (memq theme custom-known-themes))
 
 (defsubst custom-check-theme (theme)
   (memq theme custom-known-themes))
 
 (defsubst custom-check-theme (theme)

-  "Check whether THEME is valid and signal an error if NOT"
+  "Check whether THEME is valid and signal an error if NOT."

   (unless (custom-theme-p theme)
     (error "Unknown theme `%s'" theme)))
 
   (unless (custom-theme-p theme)
     (error "Unknown theme `%s'" theme)))
 

@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ BODY is as with custom-theme-load-themes."
 
 
 (defsubst copy-upto-last (elt list)
 
 
 (defsubst copy-upto-last (elt list)

-  "Copy all the elements of the list upto the last occurrence of elt"
+  "Copy all the elements of the list upto the last occurrence of elt."

   ;; Is it faster to do more work in C than to do less in elisp?
   (nreverse (cdr (member elt (reverse list)))))
 
   ;; Is it faster to do more work in C than to do less in elisp?
   (nreverse (cdr (member elt (reverse list)))))