* Interface to X Windows::
* Index::
-@detailmenu --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
+@detailmenu
+
+--- The Detailed Node Listing ---
A History of Emacs
* Allocation from Frob Blocks::
* lrecords::
* Low-level allocation::
-* Pure Space::
* Cons::
* Vector::
* Bit Vector::
Unfortunately, there is no perfect language. Static typing allows a
compiler to catch programmer errors and produce more efficient code, but
-makes programming more tedious and less fun. For the forseeable future,
+makes programming more tedious and less fun. For the foreseeable future,
an Ideal Editing and Programming Environment (and that is what XEmacs
aspires to) will be programmable in multiple languages: high level ones
like Lisp for user customization and prototyping, and lower level ones
When the Lisp initialization code is done, the C code enters the event
loop, and stays there for the duration of the XEmacs process. The code
-for the event loop is contained in @file{keyboard.c}, and is called
+for the event loop is contained in @file{cmdloop.c}, and is called
@code{Fcommand_loop_1()}. Note that this event loop could very well be
written in Lisp, and in fact a Lisp version exists; but apparently,
doing this makes XEmacs run noticeably slower.
[ 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]
[ 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ]
- <---> ^ <------------------------------------------------------>
- tag | a pointer to a structure, or an integer
- |
- mark bit
-@end example
-
-The tag describes the type of the Lisp object. For integers and chars,
-the lower 28 bits contain the value of the integer or char; for all
-others, the lower 28 bits contain a pointer. The mark bit is used
-during garbage-collection, and is always 0 when garbage collection is
-not happening. (The way that garbage collection works, basically, is that it
-loops over all places where Lisp objects could exist---this includes
-all global variables in C that contain Lisp objects [including
-@code{Vobarray}, the C equivalent of @code{obarray}; through this, all
-Lisp variables will get marked], plus various other places---and
-recursively scans through the Lisp objects, marking each object it finds
-by setting the mark bit. Then it goes through the lists of all objects
-allocated, freeing the ones that are not marked and turning off the mark
-bit of the ones that are marked.)
+ <---------------------------------------------------------> <->
+ a pointer to a structure, or an integer tag
+@end example
+
+A tag of 00 is used for all pointer object types, a tag of 10 is used
+for characters, and the other two tags 01 and 11 are joined together to
+form the integer object type. This representation gives us 31 bit
+integers and 30 bit characters, while pointers are represented directly
+without any bit masking or shifting. This representation, though,
+assumes that pointers to structs are always aligned to multiples of 4,
+so the lower 2 bits are always zero.
Lisp objects use the typedef @code{Lisp_Object}, but the actual C type
used for the Lisp object can vary. It can be either a simple type
machine word to represent the object (some compilers will use more
general and less efficient code for unions and structs even if they can
fit in a machine word). The union type, however, has the advantage of
-stricter type checking (if you accidentally pass an integer where a Lisp
-object is desired, you get a compile error), and it makes it easier to
-decode Lisp objects when debugging. The choice of which type to use is
-determined by the preprocessor constant @code{USE_UNION_TYPE} which is
-defined via the @code{--use-union-type} option to @code{configure}.
-
-@cindex record type
-
-Note that there are only eight types that the tag can represent, but
-many more actual types than this. This is handled by having one of the
-tag types specify a meta-type called a @dfn{record}; for all such
-objects, the first four bytes of the pointed-to structure indicate what
-the actual type is.
-
-Note also that having 28 bits for pointers and integers restricts a lot
-of things to 256 megabytes of memory. (Basically, enough pointers and
-indices and whatnot get stuffed into Lisp objects that the total amount
-of memory used by XEmacs can't grow above 256 megabytes. In older
-versions of XEmacs and GNU Emacs, the tag was 5 bits wide, allowing for
-32 types, which was more than the actual number of types that existed at
-the time, and no ``record'' type was necessary. However, this limited
-the editor to 64 megabytes total, which some users who edited large
-files might conceivably exceed.)
-
-Also, note that there is an implicit assumption here that all pointers
-are low enough that the top bits are all zero and can just be chopped
-off. On standard machines that allocate memory from the bottom up (and
-give each process its own address space), this works fine. Some
-machines, however, put the data space somewhere else in memory
-(e.g. beginning at 0x80000000). Those machines cope by defining
-@code{DATA_SEG_BITS} in the corresponding @file{m/} or @file{s/} file to
-the proper mask. Then, pointers retrieved from Lisp objects are
-automatically OR'ed with this value prior to being used.
-
-A corollary of the previous paragraph is that @strong{(pointers to)
-stack-allocated structures cannot be put into Lisp objects}. The stack
-is generally located near the top of memory; if you put such a pointer
-into a Lisp object, it will get its top bits chopped off, and you will
-lose.
-
-Actually, there's an alternative representation of a @code{Lisp_Object},
-invented by Kyle Jones, that is used when the
-@code{--use-minimal-tagbits} option to @code{configure} is used. In
-this case the 2 lower bits are used for the tag bits. This
-representation assumes that pointers to structs are always aligned to
-multiples of 4, so the lower 2 bits are always zero.
-
-@example
- [ 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]
- [ 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ]
-
- <---------------------------------------------------------> <->
- a pointer to a structure, or an integer tag
-@end example
-
-A tag of 00 is used for all pointer object types, a tag of 10 is used
-for characters, and the other two tags 01 and 11 are joined together to
-form the integer object type. The markbit is moved to part of the
-structure being pointed at (integers and chars do not need to be marked,
-since no memory is allocated). This representation has these
-advantages:
-
-@enumerate
-@item
-31 bits can be used for Lisp Integers.
-@item
-@emph{Any} pointer can be represented directly, and no bit masking
-operations are necessary.
-@end enumerate
-
-The disadvantages are:
-
-@enumerate
-@item
-An extra level of indirection is needed when accessing the object types
-that were not record types. So checking whether a Lisp object is a cons
-cell becomes a slower operation.
-@item
-Mark bits can no longer be stored directly in Lisp objects, so another
-place for them must be found. This means that a cons cell requires more
-memory than merely room for 2 lisp objects, leading to extra memory use.
-@end enumerate
-
-Various macros are used to construct Lisp objects and extract the
-components. Macros of the form @code{XINT()}, @code{XCHAR()},
-@code{XSTRING()}, @code{XSYMBOL()}, etc. mask out the pointer/integer
-field and cast it to the appropriate type. All of the macros that
-construct pointers will @code{OR} with @code{DATA_SEG_BITS} if
-necessary. @code{XINT()} needs to be a bit tricky so that negative
-numbers are properly sign-extended: Usually it does this by shifting the
-number four bits to the left and then four bits to the right. This
-assumes that the right-shift operator does an arithmetic shift (i.e. it
-leaves the most-significant bit as-is rather than shifting in a zero, so
-that it mimics a divide-by-two even for negative numbers). Not all
-machines/compilers do this, and on the ones that don't, a more
-complicated definition is selected by defining
-@code{EXPLICIT_SIGN_EXTEND}.
-
-Note that when @code{ERROR_CHECK_TYPECHECK} is defined, the extractor
+stricter type checking. If you accidentally pass an integer where a Lisp
+object is desired, you get a compile error. The choice of which type
+to use is determined by the preprocessor constant @code{USE_UNION_TYPE}
+which is defined via the @code{--use-union-type} option to
+@code{configure}.
+
+Various macros are used to convert between Lisp_Objects and the
+corresponding C type. Macros of the form @code{XINT()}, @code{XCHAR()},
+@code{XSTRING()}, @code{XSYMBOL()}, do any required bit shifting and/or
+masking and cast it to the appropriate type. @code{XINT()} needs to be
+a bit tricky so that negative numbers are properly sign-extended. Since
+integers are stored left-shifted, if the right-shift operator does an
+arithmetic shift (i.e. it leaves the most-significant bit as-is rather
+than shifting in a zero, so that it mimics a divide-by-two even for
+negative numbers) the shift to remove the tag bit is enough. This is
+the case on all the systems we support.
+
+Note that when @code{ERROR_CHECK_TYPECHECK} is defined, the converter
macros become more complicated---they check the tag bits and/or the
type field in the first four bytes of a record type to ensure that the
object is really of the correct type. This is great for catching places
There are similar @code{XSET@var{TYPE}()} macros that construct a Lisp
object. These macros are of the form @code{XSET@var{TYPE}
-(@var{lvalue}, @var{result})},
-i.e. they have to be a statement rather than just used in an expression.
-The reason for this is that standard C doesn't let you ``construct'' a
-structure (but GCC does). Granted, this sometimes isn't too convenient;
-for the case of integers, at least, you can use the function
-@code{make_int()}, which constructs and @emph{returns} an integer
-Lisp object. Note that the @code{XSET@var{TYPE}()} macros are also
-affected by @code{ERROR_CHECK_TYPECHECK} and make sure that the
-structure is of the right type in the case of record types, where the
-type is contained in the structure.
+(@var{lvalue}, @var{result})}, i.e. they have to be a statement rather
+than just used in an expression. The reason for this is that standard C
+doesn't let you ``construct'' a structure (but GCC does). Granted, this
+sometimes isn't too convenient; for the case of integers, at least, you
+can use the function @code{make_int()}, which constructs and
+@emph{returns} an integer Lisp object. Note that the
+@code{XSET@var{TYPE}()} macros are also affected by
+@code{ERROR_CHECK_TYPECHECK} and make sure that the structure is of the
+right type in the case of record types, where the type is contained in
+the structure.
The C programmer is responsible for @strong{guaranteeing} that a
-Lisp_Object is is the correct type before using the @code{X@var{TYPE}}
+Lisp_Object is the correct type before using the @code{X@var{TYPE}}
macros. This is especially important in the case of lists. Use
@code{XCAR} and @code{XCDR} if a Lisp_Object is certainly a cons cell,
else use @code{Fcar()} and @code{Fcdr()}. Trust other C code, but not
Lisp code. On the other hand, if XEmacs has an internal logic error,
-it's better to crash immediately, so sprinkle ``unreachable''
-@code{abort()}s liberally about the source code.
+it's better to crash immediately, so sprinkle @code{assert()}s and
+``unreachable'' @code{abort()}s liberally about the source code. Where
+performance is an issue, use @code{type_checking_assert},
+@code{bufpos_checking_assert}, and @code{gc_checking_assert}, which do
+nothing unless the corresponding configure error checking flag was
+specified.
@node Rules When Writing New C Code, A Summary of the Various XEmacs Modules, How Lisp Objects Are Represented in C, Top
@chapter Rules When Writing New C Code
@file{s/} and @file{m/} files work out correctly.
When including header files, always use angle brackets, not double
-quotes, except when the file to be included is in the same directory as
-the including file. If either file is a generated file, then that is
-not likely to be the case. In order to understand why we have this
-rule, imagine what happens when you do a build in the source directory
-using @samp{./configure} and another build in another directory using
-@samp{../work/configure}. There will be two different @file{config.h}
-files. Which one will be used if you @samp{#include "config.h"}?
+quotes, except when the file to be included is always in the same
+directory as the including file. If either file is a generated file,
+then that is not likely to be the case. In order to understand why we
+have this rule, imagine what happens when you do a build in the source
+directory using @samp{./configure} and another build in another
+directory using @samp{../work/configure}. There will be two different
+@file{config.h} files. Which one will be used if you @samp{#include
+"config.h"}?
@strong{All global and static variables that are to be modifiable must
be declared uninitialized.} This means that you may not use the
segment is re-mapped so that it becomes part of the (unmodifiable) code
segment in the dumped executable. This allows this memory to be shared
among multiple running XEmacs processes. XEmacs is careful to place as
-much constant data as possible into initialized variables (in
-particular, into what's called the @dfn{pure space}---see below) during
-the @file{temacs} phase.
+much constant data as possible into initialized variables during the
+@file{temacs} phase.
@cindex copy-on-write
@strong{Please note:} This kludge only works on a few systems nowadays,
macro style is:
@example
-#define FOO(var, value) do @{ \
+#define FOO(var, value) do @{ \
Lisp_Object FOO_value = (value); \
... /* compute using FOO_value */ \
(var) = bar; \
The data representing the text in a buffer or string is logically a set
of @code{Bufbyte}s.
-XEmacs does not work with character formats all the time; when reading
-characters from the outside, it decodes them to an internal format, and
-likewise encodes them when writing. @code{Bufbyte} (in fact
+XEmacs does not work with the same character formats all the time; when
+reading characters from the outside, it decodes them to an internal
+format, and likewise encodes them when writing. @code{Bufbyte} (in fact
@code{unsigned char}) is the basic unit of XEmacs internal buffers and
-strings format.
+strings format. A @code{Bufbyte *} is the type that points at text
+encoded in the variable-width internal encoding.
One character can correspond to one or more @code{Bufbyte}s. In the
-current implementation, an ASCII character is represented by the same
-@code{Bufbyte}, and extended characters are represented by a sequence of
-@code{Bufbyte}s.
+current Mule implementation, an ASCII character is represented by the
+same @code{Bufbyte}, and other characters are represented by a sequence
+of two or more @code{Bufbyte}s.
-Without Mule support, a @code{Bufbyte} is equivalent to an
-@code{Emchar}.
+Without Mule support, there are exactly 256 characters, implicitly
+Latin-1, and each character is represented using one @code{Bufbyte}, and
+there is a one-to-one correspondence between @code{Bufbyte}s and
+@code{Emchar}s.
@item Bufpos
@itemx Charcount
A @code{Charcount} represents a number (count) of characters.
Logically, subtracting two @code{Bufpos} values yields a
@code{Charcount} value. Although all of these are @code{typedef}ed to
-@code{int}, we use them in preference to @code{int} to make it clear
-what sort of position is being used.
+@code{EMACS_INT}, we use them in preference to @code{EMACS_INT} to make
+it clear what sort of position is being used.
@code{Bufpos} and @code{Charcount} values are the only ones that are
ever visible to Lisp.
@cindex Bytind
@cindex Bytecount
A @code{Bytind} represents a byte position in a buffer or string. A
-@code{Bytecount} represents the distance between two positions in bytes.
+@code{Bytecount} represents the distance between two positions, in bytes.
The relationship between @code{Bytind} and @code{Bytecount} is the same
as the relationship between @code{Bufpos} and @code{Charcount}.
@table @code
@item MAX_EMCHAR_LEN
@cindex MAX_EMCHAR_LEN
-This preprocessor constant is the maximum number of buffer bytes per
-Emacs character, i.e. the byte length of an @code{Emchar}. It is useful
-when allocating temporary strings to keep a known number of characters.
-For instance:
+This preprocessor constant is the maximum number of buffer bytes to
+represent an Emacs character in the variable width internal encoding.
+It is useful when allocating temporary strings to keep a known number of
+characters. For instance:
@example
@group
The interface to conversion between the internal and external
representations of text are the numerous conversion macros defined in
-@file{buffer.h}. Before looking at them, we'll look at the external
-formats supported by these macros.
-
-Currently meaningful formats are @code{FORMAT_BINARY},
-@code{FORMAT_FILENAME}, @code{FORMAT_OS}, and @code{FORMAT_CTEXT}. Here
-is a description of these.
+@file{buffer.h}. There used to be a fixed set of external formats
+supported by these macros, but now any coding system can be used with
+these macros. The coding system alias mechanism is used to create the
+following logical coding systems, which replace the fixed external
+formats. The (dontusethis-set-symbol-value-handler) mechanism was
+enhanced to make this possible (more work on that is needed - like
+remove the @code{dontusethis-} prefix).
@table @code
-@item FORMAT_BINARY
-Binary format. This is the simplest format and is what we use in the
-absence of a more appropriate format. This converts according to the
-@code{binary} coding system:
+@item Qbinary
+This is the simplest format and is what we use in the absence of a more
+appropriate format. This converts according to the @code{binary} coding
+system:
@enumerate a
@item
-On input, bytes 0--255 are converted into characters 0--255.
+On input, bytes 0--255 are converted into (implicitly Latin-1)
+characters 0--255. A non-Mule xemacs doesn't really know about
+different character sets and the fonts to display them, so the bytes can
+be treated as text in different 1-byte encodings by simply setting the
+appropriate fonts. So in a sense, non-Mule xemacs is a multi-lingual
+editor if, for example, different fonts are used to display text in
+different buffers, faces, or windows. The specifier mechanism gives the
+user complete control over this kind of behavior.
@item
On output, characters 0--255 are converted into bytes 0--255 and other
-characters are converted into `X'.
+characters are converted into `~'.
@end enumerate
-@item FORMAT_FILENAME
-Format used for filenames. In the original Mule, this is user-definable
-with the @code{pathname-coding-system} variable. For the moment, we
-just use the @code{binary} coding system.
+@item Qfile_name
+Format used for filenames. This is user-definable via either the
+@code{file-name-coding-system} or @code{pathname-coding-system} (now
+obsolete) variables.
-@item FORMAT_OS
+@item Qnative
Format used for the external Unix environment---@code{argv[]}, stuff
from @code{getenv()}, stuff from the @file{/etc/passwd} file, etc.
+Currently this is the same as Qfile_name. The two should be
+distinguished for clarity and possible future separation.
-Perhaps should be the same as FORMAT_FILENAME.
-
-@item FORMAT_CTEXT
-Compound--text format. This is the standard X format used for data
+@item Qctext
+Compound--text format. This is the standard X11 format used for data
stored in properties, selections, and the like. This is an 8-bit
-no-lock-shift ISO2022 coding system.
+no-lock-shift ISO2022 coding system. This is a real coding system,
+unlike Qfile_name, which is user-definable.
@end table
-The macros to convert between these formats and the internal format, and
-vice versa, follow.
+There are two fundamental macros to convert between external and
+internal format.
+
+@code{TO_INTERNAL_FORMAT} converts external data to internal format, and
+@code{TO_EXTERNAL_FORMAT} converts the other way around. The arguments
+each of these receives are a source type, a source, a sink type, a sink,
+and a coding system (or a symbol naming a coding system).
+
+A typical call looks like
+@example
+TO_EXTERNAL_FORMAT (LISP_STRING, str, C_STRING_MALLOC, ptr, Qfile_name);
+@end example
+
+which means that the contents of the lisp string @code{str} are written
+to a malloc'ed memory area which will be pointed to by @code{ptr}, after
+the function returns. The conversion will be done using the
+@code{file-name} coding system, which will be controlled by the user
+indirectly by setting or binding the variable
+@code{file-name-coding-system}.
+
+Some sources and sinks require two C variables to specify. We use some
+preprocessor magic to allow different source and sink types, and even
+different numbers of arguments to specify different types of sources and
+sinks.
+
+So we can have a call that looks like
+@example
+TO_INTERNAL_FORMAT (DATA, (ptr, len),
+ MALLOC, (ptr, len),
+ coding_system);
+@end example
+
+The parenthesized argument pairs are required to make the preprocessor
+magic work.
+
+Here are the different source and sink types:
@table @code
-@item GET_CHARPTR_INT_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_CHARPTR_EXT_DATA_ALLOCA
-These two are the most basic conversion macros.
-@code{GET_CHARPTR_INT_DATA_ALLOCA} converts external data to internal
-format, and @code{GET_CHARPTR_EXT_DATA_ALLOCA} converts the other way
-around. The arguments each of these receives are @var{ptr} (pointer to
-the text in external format), @var{len} (length of texts in bytes),
-@var{fmt} (format of the external text), @var{ptr_out} (lvalue to which
-new text should be copied), and @var{len_out} (lvalue which will be
-assigned the length of the internal text in bytes). The resulting text
-is stored to a stack-allocated buffer. If the text doesn't need
-changing, these macros will do nothing, except for setting
-@var{len_out}.
-
-The macros above take many arguments which makes them unwieldy. For
-this reason, a number of convenience macros are defined with obvious
-functionality, but accepting less arguments. The general rule is that
-macros with @samp{INT} in their name convert text to internal Emacs
-representation, whereas the @samp{EXT} macros convert to external
-representation.
-
-@item GET_C_CHARPTR_INT_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_C_CHARPTR_EXT_DATA_ALLOCA
-As their names imply, these macros work on C char pointers, which are
-zero-terminated, and thus do not need @var{len} or @var{len_out}
-parameters.
-
-@item GET_STRING_EXT_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_C_STRING_EXT_DATA_ALLOCA
-These two macros convert a Lisp string into an external representation.
-The difference between them is that @code{GET_STRING_EXT_DATA_ALLOCA}
-stores its output to a generic string, providing @var{len_out}, the
-length of the resulting external string. On the other hand,
-@code{GET_C_STRING_EXT_DATA_ALLOCA} assumes that the caller will be
-satisfied with output string being zero-terminated.
-
-Note that for Lisp strings only one conversion direction makes sense.
-
-@item GET_C_CHARPTR_EXT_BINARY_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_CHARPTR_EXT_BINARY_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_STRING_BINARY_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_C_STRING_BINARY_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_C_CHARPTR_EXT_FILENAME_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx ...
-These macros convert internal text to a specific external
-representation, with the external format being encoded into the name of
-the macro. Note that the @code{GET_STRING_...} and
-@code{GET_C_STRING...} macros lack the @samp{EXT} tag, because they
-only make sense in that direction.
-
-@item GET_C_CHARPTR_INT_BINARY_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_CHARPTR_INT_BINARY_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx GET_C_CHARPTR_INT_FILENAME_DATA_ALLOCA
-@itemx ...
-These macros convert external text of a specific format to its internal
-representation, with the external format being incoded into the name of
-the macro.
+@item @code{DATA, (ptr, len),}
+input data is a fixed buffer of size @var{len} at address @var{ptr}
+@item @code{ALLOCA, (ptr, len),}
+output data is placed in an alloca()ed buffer of size @var{len} pointed to by @var{ptr}
+@item @code{MALLOC, (ptr, len),}
+output data is in a malloc()ed buffer of size @var{len} pointed to by @var{ptr}
+@item @code{C_STRING_ALLOCA, ptr,}
+equivalent to @code{ALLOCA (ptr, len_ignored)} on output.
+@item @code{C_STRING_MALLOC, ptr,}
+equivalent to @code{MALLOC (ptr, len_ignored)} on output
+@item @code{C_STRING, ptr,}
+equivalent to @code{DATA, (ptr, strlen (ptr) + 1)} on input
+@item @code{LISP_STRING, string,}
+input or output is a Lisp_Object of type string
+@item @code{LISP_BUFFER, buffer,}
+output is written to @code{(point)} in lisp buffer @var{buffer}
+@item @code{LISP_LSTREAM, lstream,}
+input or output is a Lisp_Object of type lstream
+@item @code{LISP_OPAQUE, object,}
+input or output is a Lisp_Object of type opaque
@end table
+Often, the data is being converted to a '\0'-byte-terminated string,
+which is the format required by many external system C APIs. For these
+purposes, a source type of @code{C_STRING} or a sink type of
+@code{C_STRING_ALLOCA} or @code{C_STRING_MALLOC} is appropriate.
+Otherwise, we should try to keep XEmacs '\0'-byte-clean, which means
+using (ptr, len) pairs.
+
+The sinks to be specified must be lvalues, unless they are the lisp
+object types @code{LISP_LSTREAM} or @code{LISP_BUFFER}.
+
+For the sink types @code{ALLOCA} and @code{C_STRING_ALLOCA}, the
+resulting text is stored in a stack-allocated buffer, which is
+automatically freed on returning from the function. However, the sink
+types @code{MALLOC} and @code{C_STRING_MALLOC} return @code{xmalloc()}ed
+memory. The caller is responsible for freeing this memory using
+@code{xfree()}.
+
+Note that it doesn't make sense for @code{LISP_STRING} to be a source
+for @code{TO_INTERNAL_FORMAT} or a sink for @code{TO_EXTERNAL_FORMAT}.
+You'll get an assertion failure if you try.
+
+
@node General Guidelines for Writing Mule-Aware Code, An Example of Mule-Aware Code, Conversion to and from External Data, Coding for Mule
@subsection General Guidelines for Writing Mule-Aware Code
buffers literally.
This means that when a system function, such as @code{readdir}, returns
-a string, you need to convert it using one of the conversion macros
+a string, you may need to convert it using one of the conversion macros
described in the previous chapter, before passing it further to Lisp.
-In the case of @code{readdir}, you would use the
-@code{GET_C_CHARPTR_INT_FILENAME_DATA_ALLOCA} macro.
+
+Actually, most of the basic system functions that accept '\0'-terminated
+string arguments, like @code{stat()} and @code{open()}, have been
+@strong{encapsulated} so that they are they @code{always} do internal to
+external conversion themselves. This means you must pass internally
+encoded data, typically the @code{XSTRING_DATA} of a Lisp_String to
+these functions. This is actually a design bug, since it unexpectedly
+changes the semantics of the system functions. A better design would be
+to provide separate versions of these system functions that accepted
+Lisp_Objects which were lisp strings in place of their current
+@code{char *} arguments.
+
+@example
+int stat_lisp (Lisp_Object path, struct stat *buf); /* Implement me */
+@end example
Also note that many internal functions, such as @code{make_string},
accept Bufbytes, which removes the need for them to convert the data
@node An Example of Mule-Aware Code, , General Guidelines for Writing Mule-Aware Code, Coding for Mule
@subsection An Example of Mule-Aware Code
-As an example of Mule-aware code, we shall will analyze the
-@code{string} function, which conses up a Lisp string from the character
-arguments it receives. Here is the definition, pasted from
-@code{alloc.c}:
+As an example of Mule-aware code, we will analyze the @code{string}
+function, which conses up a Lisp string from the character arguments it
+receives. Here is the definition, pasted from @code{alloc.c}:
@example
@group
@node Techniques for XEmacs Developers, , Coding for Mule, Rules When Writing New C Code
@section Techniques for XEmacs Developers
+To make a purified XEmacs, do: @code{make puremacs}.
To make a quantified XEmacs, do: @code{make quantmacs}.
-You simply can't dump Quantified and Purified images. Run the image
-like so: @code{quantmacs -batch -l loadup.el run-temacs @var{xemacs-args...}}.
+You simply can't dump Quantified and Purified images (unless using the
+portable dumper). Purify gets confused when xemacs frees memory in one
+process that was allocated in a @emph{different} process on a different
+machine!. Run it like so:
+@example
+temacs -batch -l loadup.el run-temacs @var{xemacs-args...}
+@end example
Before you go through the trouble, are you compiling with all
-debugging and error-checking off? If not try that first. Be warned
+debugging and error-checking off? If not, try that first. Be warned
that while Quantify is directly responsible for quite a few
optimizations which have been made to XEmacs, doing a run which
generates results which can be acted upon is not necessarily a trivial
calls in elisp are especially expensive. Iterating over a long list is
going to be 30 times faster implemented in C than in Elisp.
+Heavily used small code fragments need to be fast. The traditional way
+to implement such code fragments in C is with macros. But macros in C
+are known to be broken.
+
+Macro arguments that are repeatedly evaluated may suffer from repeated
+side effects or suboptimal performance.
+
+Variable names used in macros may collide with caller's variables,
+causing (at least) unwanted compiler warnings.
+
+In order to solve these problems, and maintain statement semantics, one
+should use the @code{do @{ ... @} while (0)} trick while trying to
+reference macro arguments exactly once using local variables.
+
+Let's take a look at this poor macro definition:
+
+@example
+#define MARK_OBJECT(obj) \
+ if (!marked_p (obj)) mark_object (obj), did_mark = 1
+@end example
+
+This macro evaluates its argument twice, and also fails if used like this:
+@example
+ if (flag) MARK_OBJECT (obj); else do_something();
+@end example
+
+A much better definition is
+
+@example
+#define MARK_OBJECT(obj) do @{ \
+ Lisp_Object mo_obj = (obj); \
+ if (!marked_p (mo_obj)) \
+ @{ \
+ mark_object (mo_obj); \
+ did_mark = 1; \
+ @} \
+@} while (0)
+@end example
+
+Notice the elimination of double evaluation by using the local variable
+with the obscure name. Writing safe and efficient macros requires great
+care. The one problem with macros that cannot be portably worked around
+is, since a C block has no value, a macro used as an expression rather
+than a statement cannot use the techniques just described to avoid
+multiple evaluation.
+
+In most cases where a macro has function semantics, an inline function
+is a better implementation technique. Modern compiler optimizers tend
+to inline functions even if they have no @code{inline} keyword, and
+configure magic ensures that the @code{inline} keyword can be safely
+used as an additional compiler hint. Inline functions used in a single
+.c files are easy. The function must already be defined to be
+@code{static}. Just add another @code{inline} keyword to the
+definition.
+
+@example
+inline static int
+heavily_used_small_function (int arg)
+@{
+ ...
+@}
+@end example
+
+Inline functions in header files are trickier, because we would like to
+make the following optimization if the function is @emph{not} inlined
+(for example, because we're compiling for debugging). We would like the
+function to be defined externally exactly once, and each calling
+translation unit would create an external reference to the function,
+instead of including a definition of the inline function in the object
+code of every translation unit that uses it. This optimization is
+currently only available for gcc. But you don't have to worry about the
+trickiness; just define your inline functions in header files using this
+pattern:
+
+@example
+INLINE_HEADER int
+i_used_to_be_a_crufty_macro_but_look_at_me_now (int arg);
+INLINE_HEADER int
+i_used_to_be_a_crufty_macro_but_look_at_me_now (int arg)
+@{
+ ...
+@}
+@end example
+
+The declaration right before the definition is to prevent warnings when
+compiling with @code{gcc -Wmissing-declarations}. I consider issuing
+this warning for inline functions a gcc bug, but the gcc maintainers disagree.
+
+Every header which contains inline functions, either directly by using
+@code{INLINE_HEADER} or indirectly by using @code{DECLARE_LRECORD} must
+be added to @file{inline.c}'s includes to make the optimization
+described above work. (Optimization note: if all INLINE_HEADER
+functions are in fact inlined in all translation units, then the linker
+can just discard @code{inline.o}, since it contains only unreferenced code).
+
To get started debugging XEmacs, take a look at the @file{.gdbinit} and
-@file{.dbxrc} files in the @file{src} directory.
-@xref{Q2.1.15 - How to Debug an XEmacs problem with a debugger,,,
-xemacs-faq, XEmacs FAQ}.
+@file{.dbxrc} files in the @file{src} directory. See the section in the
+XEmacs FAQ on How to Debug an XEmacs problem with a debugger.
After making source code changes, run @code{make check} to ensure that
-you haven't introduced any regressions. If you're feeling ambitious,
-you can try to improve the test suite in @file{tests/automated}.
+you haven't introduced any regressions. If you want to make xemacs more
+reliable, please improve the test suite in @file{tests/automated}.
+
+Did you make sure you didn't introduce any new compiler warnings?
+
+Before submitting a patch, please try compiling at least once with
+
+@example
+configure --with-mule --with-union-type --error-checking=all
+@end example
Here are things to know when you create a new source file:
Generated header files should be included using the @code{#include <...>} syntax,
not the @code{#include "..."} syntax. The generated headers are:
-@file{config.h puresize-adjust.h sheap-adjust.h paths.h Emacs.ad.h}
+@file{config.h sheap-adjust.h paths.h Emacs.ad.h}
The basic rule is that you should assume builds using @code{--srcdir}
and the @code{#include <...>} syntax needs to be used when the
@code{"lisp.h"}. It is the responsibility of the @file{.c} files that
use it to do so.
-@item
-If the header uses @code{INLINE}, either directly or through
-@code{DECLARE_LRECORD}, then it must be added to @file{inline.c}'s
-includes.
-
-@item
-Try compiling at least once with
+@end itemize
-@example
-gcc --with-mule --with-union-type --error-checking=all
-@end example
+Here is a checklist of things to do when creating a new lisp object type
+named @var{foo}:
+@enumerate
@item
-Did I mention that you should run the test suite?
-@example
-make check
-@end example
-@end itemize
-
+create @var{foo}.h
+@item
+create @var{foo}.c
+@item
+add definitions of @code{syms_of_@var{foo}}, etc. to @file{@var{foo}.c}
+@item
+add declarations of @code{syms_of_@var{foo}}, etc. to @file{symsinit.h}
+@item
+add calls to @code{syms_of_@var{foo}}, etc. to @file{emacs.c}
+@item
+add definitions of macros like @code{CHECK_@var{FOO}} and
+@code{@var{FOO}P} to @file{@var{foo}.h}
+@item
+add the new type index to @code{enum lrecord_type}
+@item
+add a DEFINE_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION call to @file{@var{foo}.c}
+@item
+add an INIT_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION call to @code{syms_of_@var{foo}.c}
+@end enumerate
@node A Summary of the Various XEmacs Modules, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp, Rules When Writing New C Code, Top
@chapter A Summary of the Various XEmacs Modules
@example
-crt0.c
+ecrt0.c
lastfile.c
pre-crt0.c
@end example
@example
-prefix-args.c
-@end example
-
-This is actually the source for a small, self-contained program
-used during building.
-
-
-@example
universe.h
@end example
@section Basic Lisp Modules
@example
-emacsfns.h
lisp-disunion.h
lisp-union.h
lisp.h
@example
alloc.c
-pure.c
-puresize.h
@end example
The large module @file{alloc.c} implements all of the basic allocation and
subtypes in the subsystem; this provides a great deal of robustness to
the XEmacs code.
-@cindex pure space
-@file{pure.c} contains the declaration of the @dfn{purespace} array.
-Pure space is a hack used to place some constant Lisp data into the code
-segment of the XEmacs executable, even though the data needs to be
-initialized through function calls. (See above in section VIII for more
-info about this.) During startup, certain sorts of data is
-automatically copied into pure space, and other data is copied manually
-in some of the basic Lisp files by calling the function @code{purecopy},
-which copies the object if possible (this only works in temacs, of
-course) and returns the new object. In particular, while temacs is
-executing, the Lisp reader automatically copies all compiled-function
-objects that it reads into pure space. Since compiled-function objects
-are large, are never modified, and typically comprise the majority of
-the contents of a compiled-Lisp file, this works well. While XEmacs is
-running, any attempt to modify an object that resides in pure space
-causes an error. Objects in pure space are never garbage collected --
-almost all of the time, they're intended to be permanent, and in any
-case you can't write into pure space to set the mark bits.
-
-@file{puresize.h} contains the declaration of the size of the pure space
-array. This depends on the optional features that are compiled in, any
-extra purespace requested by the user at compile time, and certain other
-factors (e.g. 64-bit machines need more pure space because their Lisp
-objects are larger). The smallest size that suffices should be used, so
-that there's no wasted space. If there's not enough pure space, you
-will get an error during the build process, specifying how much more
-pure space is needed.
-
-
@example
eval.c
@example
event-Xt.c
+event-msw.c
event-stream.c
event-tty.c
+events-mod.h
+gpmevent.c
+gpmevent.h
events.c
events.h
@end example
@example
-keyboard.c
+cmdloop.c
@end example
-@file{keyboard.c} contains functions that implement the actual editor
+@file{cmdloop.c} contains functions that implement the actual editor
command loop---i.e. the event loop that cyclically retrieves and
dispatches events. This code is also rather tricky, just like
@file{event-stream.c}.
@section Modules for the Basic Displayable Lisp Objects
@example
-device-ns.h
-device-stream.c
-device-stream.h
+console-msw.c
+console-msw.h
+console-stream.c
+console-stream.h
+console-tty.c
+console-tty.h
+console-x.c
+console-x.h
+console.c
+console.h
+@end example
+
+These modules implement the @dfn{console} Lisp object type. A console
+contains multiple display devices, but only one keyboard and mouse.
+Most of the time, a console will contain exactly one device.
+
+Consoles are the top of a lisp object inclusion hierarchy. Consoles
+contain devices, which contain frames, which contain windows.
+
+
+
+@example
+device-msw.c
device-tty.c
-device-tty.h
device-x.c
-device-x.h
device.c
device.h
@end example
@example
-frame-ns.h
+frame-msw.c
frame-tty.c
frame-x.c
-frame-x.h
frame.c
frame.h
@end example
@example
bitmaps.h
-glyphs-ns.h
+glyphs-eimage.c
+glyphs-msw.c
+glyphs-msw.h
+glyphs-widget.c
glyphs-x.c
glyphs-x.h
glyphs.c
@example
-objects-ns.h
+objects-msw.c
+objects-msw.h
objects-tty.c
objects-tty.h
objects-x.c
@example
+menubar-msw.c
+menubar-msw.h
menubar-x.c
menubar.c
+menubar.h
@end example
@example
+scrollbar-msw.c
+scrollbar-msw.h
scrollbar-x.c
scrollbar-x.h
scrollbar.c
@example
+toolbar-msw.c
toolbar-x.c
toolbar.c
toolbar.h
@end example
These modules decode GIF-format image files, for use with glyphs.
+These files were removed due to Unisys patent infringement concerns.
@example
redisplay-output.c
+redisplay-msw.c
redisplay-tty.c
redisplay-x.c
redisplay.c
Similar to other subsystems in XEmacs, lstreams are separated into
generic functions and a set of methods for the different types of
lstreams. @file{lstream.c} provides implementations of many different
-types of streams; others are provided, e.g., in @file{mule-coding.c}.
+types of streams; others are provided, e.g., in @file{file-coding.c}.
-@example
-msdos.c
-msdos.h
-@end example
-
-These modules are used for MS-DOS support, which does not work in
-XEmacs.
-
-
-
@node Modules for Interfacing with X Windows, Modules for Internationalization, Modules for Interfacing with the Operating System, A Summary of the Various XEmacs Modules
@section Modules for Interfacing with X Windows
@example
-xselect.c
+select-msw.c
+select-x.c
+select.c
+select.h
@end example
@cindex selections
mule-ccl.c
mule-charset.c
mule-charset.h
-mule-coding.c
-mule-coding.h
+file-coding.c
+file-coding.h
mule-mcpath.c
mule-mcpath.h
mule-wnnfns.c
just Asian languages (although they are generally the most complicated
to support). This code is still in beta.
-@file{mule-charset.*} and @file{mule-coding.*} provide the heart of the
+@file{mule-charset.*} and @file{file-coding.*} provide the heart of the
XEmacs MULE support. @file{mule-charset.*} implements the @dfn{charset}
Lisp object type, which encapsulates a character set (an ordered one- or
two-dimensional set of characters, such as US ASCII or JISX0208 Japanese
Kanji).
-@file{mule-coding.*} implements the @dfn{coding-system} Lisp object
+@file{file-coding.*} implements the @dfn{coding-system} Lisp object
type, which encapsulates a method of converting between different
encodings. An encoding is a representation of a stream of characters,
possibly from multiple character sets, using a stream of bytes or words,
* Allocation from Frob Blocks::
* lrecords::
* Low-level allocation::
-* Pure Space::
* Cons::
* Vector::
* Bit Vector::
have no corresponding Lisp primitives. Every Lisp object, though,
has at least one C primitive for creating it.
- Recall from section (VII) that a Lisp object, as stored in a 32-bit
-or 64-bit word, has a mark bit, a few tag bits, and a ``value'' that
-occupies the remainder of the bits. We can separate the different
-Lisp object types into four broad categories:
+ Recall from section (VII) that a Lisp object, as stored in a 32-bit or
+64-bit word, has a few tag bits, and a ``value'' that occupies the
+remainder of the bits. We can separate the different Lisp object types
+into three broad categories:
@itemize @bullet
@item
@code{GCPRO}ed.
@end itemize
- In the remaining three categories, the value is a pointer to a
-structure.
-
-@itemize @bullet
-@item
-@cindex frob block
-(b) Those for whom the tag directly specifies the type. Recall that
-there are only three tag bits; this means that at most five types can be
-specified this way. The most commonly-used types are stored in this
-format; this includes conses, strings, vectors, and sometimes symbols.
-With the exception of vectors, objects in this category are allocated in
-@dfn{frob blocks}, i.e. large blocks of memory that are subdivided into
-individual objects. This saves a lot on malloc overhead, since there
-are typically quite a lot of these objects around, and the objects are
-small. (A cons, for example, occupies 8 bytes on 32-bit machines---4
-bytes for each of the two objects it contains.) Vectors are individually
-@code{malloc()}ed since they are of variable size. (It would be
-possible, and desirable, to allocate vectors of certain small sizes out
-of frob blocks, but it isn't currently done.) Strings are handled
-specially: Each string is allocated in two parts, a fixed size structure
-containing a length and a data pointer, and the actual data of the
-string. The former structure is allocated in frob blocks as usual, and
-the latter data is stored in @dfn{string chars blocks} and is relocated
-during garbage collection to eliminate holes.
-@end itemize
-
In the remaining two categories, the type is stored in the object
itself. The tag for all such objects is the generic @dfn{lrecord}
-(Lisp_Record) tag. The first four bytes (or eight, for 64-bit machines)
-of the object's structure are a pointer to a structure that describes
-the object's type, which includes method pointers and a pointer to a
-string naming the type. Note that it's possible to save some space by
-using a one- or two-byte tag, rather than a four- or eight-byte pointer
-to store the type, but it's not clear it's worth making the change.
+(Lisp_Type_Record) tag. The first bytes of the object's structure are an
+integer (actually a char) characterising the object's type and some
+flags, in particular the mark bit used for garbage collection. A
+structure describing the type is accessible thru the
+lrecord_implementation_table indexed with said integer. This structure
+includes the method pointers and a pointer to a string naming the type.
@itemize @bullet
@item
-(c) Those lrecords that are allocated in frob blocks (see above). This
+(b) Those lrecords that are allocated in frob blocks (see above). This
includes the objects that are most common and relatively small, and
-includes floats, compiled functions, symbols (when not in category (b)),
+includes conses, strings, subrs, floats, compiled functions, symbols,
extents, events, and markers. With the cleanup of frob blocks done in
19.12, it's not terribly hard to add more objects to this category, but
-it's a bit trickier than adding an object type to type (d) (esp. if the
+it's a bit trickier than adding an object type to type (c) (esp. if the
object needs a finalization method), and is not likely to save much
space unless the object is small and there are many of them. (In fact,
if there are very few of them, it might actually waste space.)
@item
-(d) Those lrecords that are individually @code{malloc()}ed. These are
+(c) Those lrecords that are individually @code{malloc()}ed. These are
called @dfn{lcrecords}. All other types are in this category. Adding a
new type to this category is comparatively easy, and all types added
since 19.8 (when the current allocation scheme was devised, by Richard
@end itemize
Note that bit vectors are a bit of a special case. They are
-simple lrecords as in category (c), but are individually @code{malloc()}ed
+simple lrecords as in category (b), but are individually @code{malloc()}ed
like vectors. You can basically view them as exactly like vectors
except that their type is stored in lrecord fashion rather than
in directly-tagged fashion.
- Note that FSF Emacs redesigned their object system in 19.29 to follow
-a similar scheme. However, given RMS's expressed dislike for data
-abstraction, the FSF scheme is not nearly as clean or as easy to
-extend. (FSF calls items of type (c) @code{Lisp_Misc} and items of type
-(d) @code{Lisp_Vectorlike}, with separate tags for each, although
-@code{Lisp_Vectorlike} is also used for vectors.)
@node Garbage Collection, GCPROing, Introduction to Allocation, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp
@section Garbage Collection
all vectors (which are chained in one big list), and all
lcrecords (which are likewise chained).
- Note that, when an object is marked, the mark has to occur
-inside of the object's structure, rather than in the 32-bit
-@code{Lisp_Object} holding the object's pointer; i.e. you can't just
-set the pointer's mark bit. This is because there may be many
-pointers to the same object. This means that the method of
-marking an object can differ depending on the type. The
-different marking methods are approximately as follows:
-
-@enumerate
-@item
-For conses, the mark bit of the car is set.
-@item
-For strings, the mark bit of the string's plist is set.
-@item
-For symbols when not lrecords, the mark bit of the
-symbol's plist is set.
-@item
-For vectors, the length is negated after adding 1.
-@item
-For lrecords, the pointer to the structure describing
-the type is changed (see below).
-@item
-Integers and characters do not need to be marked, since
-no allocation occurs for them.
-@end enumerate
-
- The details of this are in the @code{mark_object()} function.
-
- Note that any code that operates during garbage collection has
-to be especially careful because of the fact that some objects
-may be marked and as such may not look like they normally do.
-In particular:
+ Garbage collection can be invoked explicitly by calling
+@code{garbage-collect} but is also called automatically by @code{eval},
+once a certain amount of memory has been allocated since the last
+garbage collection (according to @code{gc-cons-threshold}).
-@itemize @bullet
-Some object pointers may have their mark bit set. This will make
-@code{FOOBARP()} predicates fail. Use @code{GC_FOOBARP()} to deal with
-this.
-@item
-Even if you clear the mark bit, @code{FOOBARP()} will still fail
-for lrecords because the implementation pointer has been
-changed (see below). @code{GC_FOOBARP()} will correctly deal with
-this.
-@item
-Vectors have their size field munged, so anything that
-looks at this field will fail.
-@item
-Note that @code{XFOOBAR()} macros @emph{will} work correctly on object
-pointers with their mark bit set, because the logical shift operations
-that remove the tag also remove the mark bit.
-@end itemize
-
- Finally, note that garbage collection can be invoked explicitly
-by calling @code{garbage-collect} but is also called automatically
-by @code{eval}, once a certain amount of memory has been allocated
-since the last garbage collection (according to @code{gc-cons-threshold}).
@node GCPROing, Garbage Collection - Step by Step, Garbage Collection, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp
@section @code{GCPRO}ing
@enumerate
@item
-All objects that have been @code{staticpro()}d. This is used for
-any global C variables that hold Lisp objects. A call to
-@code{staticpro()} happens implicitly as a result of any symbols
-declared with @code{defsymbol()} and any variables declared with
-@code{DEFVAR_FOO()}. You need to explicitly call @code{staticpro()}
-(in the @code{vars_of_foo()} method of a module) for other global
-C variables holding Lisp objects. (This typically includes
-internal lists and such things.)
+All objects that have been @code{staticpro()}d or
+@code{staticpro_nodump()}ed. This is used for any global C variables
+that hold Lisp objects. A call to @code{staticpro()} happens implicitly
+as a result of any symbols declared with @code{defsymbol()} and any
+variables declared with @code{DEFVAR_FOO()}. You need to explicitly
+call @code{staticpro()} (in the @code{vars_of_foo()} method of a module)
+for other global C variables holding Lisp objects. (This typically
+includes internal lists and such things.). Use
+@code{staticpro_nodump()} only in the rare cases when you do not want
+the pointed variable to be saved at dump time but rather recompute it at
+startup.
Note that @code{obarray} is one of the @code{staticpro()}d things.
Therefore, all functions and variables get marked through this.
The upshot is that garbage collection can basically occur everywhere
@code{Feval}, respectively @code{Ffuncall}, is used - either directly or
-through another function. Since calls to these two functions are
-hidden in various other functions, many calls to
-@code{garabge_collect_1} are not obviously foreseeable, and therefore
-unexpected. Instances where they are used that are worth remembering are
-various elisp commands, as for example @code{or},
-@code{and}, @code{if}, @code{cond}, @code{while}, @code{setq}, etc.,
-miscellaneous @code{gui_item_...} functions, everything related to
-@code{eval} (@code{Feval_buffer}, @code{call0}, ...) and inside
-@code{Fsignal}. The latter is used to handle signals, as for example the
-ones raised by every @code{QUITE}-macro triggered after pressing Ctrl-g.
+through another function. Since calls to these two functions are hidden
+in various other functions, many calls to @code{garbage_collect_1} are
+not obviously foreseeable, and therefore unexpected. Instances where
+they are used that are worth remembering are various elisp commands, as
+for example @code{or}, @code{and}, @code{if}, @code{cond}, @code{while},
+@code{setq}, etc., miscellaneous @code{gui_item_...} functions,
+everything related to @code{eval} (@code{Feval_buffer}, @code{call0},
+...) and inside @code{Fsignal}. The latter is used to handle signals, as
+for example the ones raised by every @code{QUITE}-macro triggered after
+pressing Ctrl-g.
@node garbage_collect_1, mark_object, Invocation, Garbage Collection - Step by Step
@subsection @code{garbage_collect_1}
all the output occurring during garbage collecting is determined. In
order to be able to restore the old display's state after displaying the
message, some data about the current cursor position has to be
-saved. The variables @code{pre_gc_curser} and @code{cursor_changed} take
+saved. The variables @code{pre_gc_cursor} and @code{cursor_changed} take
care of that.
@item
The state of @code{gc_currently_forbidden} must be restored after
@item
The function @code{prune_specifiers} checks all listed specifiers held
-in @code{Vall_speficiers} and removes the ones from the lists that are
+in @code{Vall_specifiers} and removes the ones from the lists that are
unmarked.
@item
Our next candidates are the other objects that behave quite differently
than everything else: the strings. They consists of two parts, a
-fixed-size portion (@code{struct Lisp_string}) holding the string's
+fixed-size portion (@code{struct Lisp_String}) holding the string's
length, its property list and a pointer to the second part, and the
actual string data, which is stored in string-chars blocks comparable to
frob blocks. In this block, the data is not only freed, but also a
[see @file{lrecord.h}]
All lrecords have at the beginning of their structure a @code{struct
-lrecord_header}. This just contains a pointer to a @code{struct
+lrecord_header}. This just contains a type number and some flags,
+including the mark bit. All builtin type numbers are defined as
+constants in @code{enum lrecord_type}, to allow the compiler to generate
+more efficient code for @code{@var{type}P}. The type number, thru the
+@code{lrecord_implementation_table}, gives access to a @code{struct
lrecord_implementation}, which is a structure containing method pointers
and such. There is one of these for each type, and it is a global,
constant, statically-declared structure that is declared in the
-@code{DEFINE_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION()} macro. (This macro actually
-declares an array of two @code{struct lrecord_implementation}
-structures. The first one contains all the standard method pointers,
-and is used in all normal circumstances. During garbage collection,
-however, the lrecord is @dfn{marked} by bumping its implementation
-pointer by one, so that it points to the second structure in the array.
-This structure contains a special indication in it that it's a
-@dfn{marked-object} structure: the finalize method is the special
-function @code{this_marks_a_marked_record()}, and all other methods are
-null pointers. At the end of garbage collection, all lrecords will
-either be reclaimed or unmarked by decrementing their implementation
-pointers, so this second structure pointer will never remain past
-garbage collection.
-
- Simple lrecords (of type (c) above) just have a @code{struct
+@code{DEFINE_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION()} macro.
+
+ Simple lrecords (of type (b) above) just have a @code{struct
lrecord_header} at their beginning. lcrecords, however, actually have a
@code{struct lcrecord_header}. This, in turn, has a @code{struct
lrecord_header} at its beginning, so sanity is preserved; but it also
Whenever you create an lrecord, you need to call either
@code{DEFINE_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION()} or
@code{DEFINE_LRECORD_SEQUENCE_IMPLEMENTATION()}. This needs to be
-specified in a C file, at the top level. What this actually does is
-define and initialize the implementation structure for the lrecord. (And
-possibly declares a function @code{error_check_foo()} that implements
-the @code{XFOO()} macro when error-checking is enabled.) The arguments
-to the macros are the actual type name (this is used to construct the C
-variable name of the lrecord implementation structure and related
-structures using the @samp{##} macro concatenation operator), a string
-that names the type on the Lisp level (this may not be the same as the C
-type name; typically, the C type name has underscores, while the Lisp
-string has dashes), various method pointers, and the name of the C
-structure that contains the object. The methods are used to encapsulate
-type-specific information about the object, such as how to print it or
-mark it for garbage collection, so that it's easy to add new object
-types without having to add a specific case for each new type in a bunch
-of different places.
+specified in a @file{.c} file, at the top level. What this actually
+does is define and initialize the implementation structure for the
+lrecord. (And possibly declares a function @code{error_check_foo()} that
+implements the @code{XFOO()} macro when error-checking is enabled.) The
+arguments to the macros are the actual type name (this is used to
+construct the C variable name of the lrecord implementation structure
+and related structures using the @samp{##} macro concatenation
+operator), a string that names the type on the Lisp level (this may not
+be the same as the C type name; typically, the C type name has
+underscores, while the Lisp string has dashes), various method pointers,
+and the name of the C structure that contains the object. The methods
+are used to encapsulate type-specific information about the object, such
+as how to print it or mark it for garbage collection, so that it's easy
+to add new object types without having to add a specific case for each
+new type in a bunch of different places.
The difference between @code{DEFINE_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION()} and
@code{DEFINE_LRECORD_SEQUENCE_IMPLEMENTATION()} is that the former is
For the purpose of keeping allocation statistics, the allocation
engine keeps a list of all the different types that exist. Note that,
since @code{DEFINE_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION()} is a macro that is
-specified at top-level, there is no way for it to add to the list of all
-existing types. What happens instead is that each implementation
-structure contains in it a dynamically assigned number that is
-particular to that type. (Or rather, it contains a pointer to another
-structure that contains this number. This evasiveness is done so that
-the implementation structure can be declared const.) In the sweep stage
-of garbage collection, each lrecord is examined to see if its
-implementation structure has its dynamically-assigned number set. If
-not, it must be a new type, and it is added to the list of known types
-and a new number assigned. The number is used to index into an array
-holding the number of objects of each type and the total memory
-allocated for objects of that type. The statistics in this array are
-also computed during the sweep stage. These statistics are returned by
-the call to @code{garbage-collect} and are printed out at the end of the
-loadup phase.
+specified at top-level, there is no way for it to initialize the global
+data structures containing type information, like
+@code{lrecord_implementations_table}. For this reason a call to
+@code{INIT_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION} must be added to the same source file
+containing @code{DEFINE_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION}, but instead of to the
+top level, to one of the init functions, typically
+@code{syms_of_@var{foo}.c}. @code{INIT_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION} must be
+called before an object of this type is used.
+
+The type number is also used to index into an array holding the number
+of objects of each type and the total memory allocated for objects of
+that type. The statistics in this array are computed during the sweep
+stage. These statistics are returned by the call to
+@code{garbage-collect}.
Note that for every type defined with a @code{DEFINE_LRECORD_*()}
macro, there needs to be a @code{DECLARE_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION()}
file. To create one of these, copy an existing model and modify as
necessary.
+ @strong{Please note:} If you define an lrecord in an external
+dynamically-loaded module, you must use @code{DECLARE_EXTERNAL_LRECORD},
+@code{DEFINE_EXTERNAL_LRECORD_IMPLEMENTATION}, and
+@code{DEFINE_EXTERNAL_LRECORD_SEQUENCE_IMPLEMENTATION} instead of the
+non-EXTERNAL forms. These macros will dynamically add new type numbers
+to the global enum that records them, whereas the non-EXTERNAL forms
+assume that the programmer has already inserted the correct type numbers
+into the enum's code at compile-time.
+
The various methods in the lrecord implementation structure are:
@enumerate
For an example, see the methods for window configurations and opaques.
@end enumerate
-@node Low-level allocation, Pure Space, lrecords, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp
+@node Low-level allocation, Cons, lrecords, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp
@section Low-level allocation
Memory that you want to allocate directly should be allocated using
(On some systems, the memory warnings are not functional.)
Allocated memory that is going to be used to make a Lisp object
-is created using @code{allocate_lisp_storage()}. This calls @code{xmalloc()}
-but also verifies that the pointer to the memory can fit into
-a Lisp word (remember that some bits are taken away for a type
-tag and a mark bit). If not, an error is issued through @code{memory_full()}.
-@code{allocate_lisp_storage()} is called by @code{alloc_lcrecord()},
-@code{ALLOCATE_FIXED_TYPE()}, and the vector and bit-vector creation
-routines. These routines also call @code{INCREMENT_CONS_COUNTER()} at the
-appropriate times; this keeps statistics on how much memory is
-allocated, so that garbage-collection can be invoked when the
-threshold is reached.
-
-@node Pure Space, Cons, Low-level allocation, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp
-@section Pure Space
-
- Not yet documented.
-
-@node Cons, Vector, Pure Space, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp
+is created using @code{allocate_lisp_storage()}. This just calls
+@code{xmalloc()}. It used to verify that the pointer to the memory can
+fit into a Lisp word, before the current Lisp object representation was
+introduced. @code{allocate_lisp_storage()} is called by
+@code{alloc_lcrecord()}, @code{ALLOCATE_FIXED_TYPE()}, and the vector
+and bit-vector creation routines. These routines also call
+@code{INCREMENT_CONS_COUNTER()} at the appropriate times; this keeps
+statistics on how much memory is allocated, so that garbage-collection
+can be invoked when the threshold is reached.
+
+@node Cons, Vector, Low-level allocation, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp
@section Cons
Conses are allocated in standard frob blocks. The only thing to
@node Symbol, Marker, Bit Vector, Allocation of Objects in XEmacs Lisp
@section Symbol
- Symbols are also allocated in frob blocks. Note that the code
-exists for symbols to be either lrecords (category (c) above)
-or simple types (category (b) above), and are lrecords by
-default (I think), although there is no good reason for this.
-
- Note that symbols in the awful horrible obarray structure are
-chained through their @code{next} field.
+ Symbols are also allocated in frob blocks. Symbols in the awful
+horrible obarray structure are chained through their @code{next} field.
Remember that @code{intern} looks up a symbol in an obarray, creating
one if necessary.
@node Dumping phase, Reloading phase, Data descriptions, Dumping
@section Dumping phase
-Dumping is done by calling the function pdump() (in alloc.c) which is
+Dumping is done by calling the function pdump() (in dumper.c) which is
invoked from Fdump_emacs (in emacs.c). This function performs a number
of tasks.
then written. They are:
@enumerate
-@item the staticpro array
-@item the dumpstruct array
-@item the lrecord_implementation_table array
-@item a vector of all the offsets to the objects in the file that include a
+@item
+the staticpro array
+@item
+the dumpstruct array
+@item
+the lrecord_implementation_table array
+@item
+a vector of all the offsets to the objects in the file that include a
description (for faster relocation at reload time)
-@item the pdump_wired and pdump_wired_list arrays
+@item
+the pdump_wired and pdump_wired_list arrays
@end enumerate
For each of the arrays we write both the pointer to the variables and
are converted into an internal form for faster execution.
When a compiled function is executed for the first time by
-@code{funcall_compiled_function()}, or when it is @code{Fpurecopy()}ed
-during the dump phase of building XEmacs, the byte-code instructions are
-converted from a @code{Lisp_String} (which is inefficient to access,
-especially in the presence of MULE) into a @code{Lisp_Opaque} object
-containing an array of unsigned char, which can be directly executed by
-the byte-code interpreter. At this time the byte code is also analyzed
-for validity and transformed into a more optimized form, so that
+@code{funcall_compiled_function()}, or during the dump phase of building
+XEmacs, the byte-code instructions are converted from a
+@code{Lisp_String} (which is inefficient to access, especially in the
+presence of MULE) into a @code{Lisp_Opaque} object containing an array
+of unsigned char, which can be directly executed by the byte-code
+interpreter. At this time the byte code is also analyzed for validity
+and transformed into a more optimized form, so that
@code{execute_optimized_program()} can really fly.
Here are some of the optimizations performed by the internal byte-code
@code{nil}, or @code{keywordp}) symbols, so that the byte interpreter
doesn't have to.
@item
-The maxiumum number of variable bindings in the byte-code is
+The maximum number of variable bindings in the byte-code is
pre-computed, so that space on the @code{specpdl} stack can be
pre-reserved once for the whole function execution.
@item
@code{let} and @code{let*}) using @code{specbind()} to create bindings
and @code{unbind_to()} to undo the bindings when finished.
-Note that, with the exeption of @code{Fprogn}, these functions are
+Note that, with the exception of @code{Fprogn}, these functions are
typically called in real life only in interpreted code, since the byte
compiler knows how to convert calls to these functions directly into
byte code.
buffer positions in them as integers, and every time text is inserted or
deleted, these positions must be updated. In order to minimize the
amount of shuffling that needs to be done, the positions in markers and
-extents (there's one per marker, two per extent) and stored in Meminds.
+extents (there's one per marker, two per extent) are stored in Meminds.
This means that they only need to be moved when the text is physically
moved in memory; since the gap structure tries to minimize this, it also
minimizes the number of marker and extent indices that need to be
other encoded/decoded data has been written out. This is not used for
charset CCL programs.
-REGISTER: 0..7 -- refered by RRR or rrr
+REGISTER: 0..7 -- referred by RRR or rrr
OPERATOR BIT FIELD (27-bit): XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX RRR TTTTT
TTTTT (5-bit): operator type
@dfn{selected display}, @dfn{selected frame}, and @dfn{selected window}.
Each of these objects is distinguished in various ways, such as being the
default object for various functions that act on objects of that type.
-Note that every containing object rememembers the ``selected'' object
+Note that every containing object remembers the ``selected'' object
among the objects that it contains: e.g. not only is there a selected
window, but every frame remembers the last window in it that was
selected, and changing the selected frame causes the remembered window
@code{redisplay-x.c}, @code{redisplay-msw.c} and @code{redisplay-tty.c}
@end enumerate
-Steps 1 and 2 are device-independant and relatively complex. Step 3 is
+Steps 1 and 2 are device-independent and relatively complex. Step 3 is
mostly device-dependent.
Determining the desired display
dynarr's of @code{display_line}'s are held by each window representing
the current display and the desired display.
-The @code{display_line} structures are tighly tied to buffers which
+The @code{display_line} structures are tightly tied to buffers which
presents a problem for redisplay as this connection is bogus for the
modeline. Hence the @code{display_line} generation routines are
duplicated for generating the modeline. This means that the modeline
domains. For instance if we create a Pixmap, we can actually display
this on multiple windows - even though we only need a single Pixmap
instance to do this. If caching wasn't done then it would be necessary
-to create image-instances for every displayable occurrance of a glyph -
+to create image-instances for every displayable occurrence of a glyph -
and every usage - and this would be extremely memory and cpu intensive.
Widget-glyphs (a.k.a native widgets) are not cached in this way. This is
tree recursively.
This has desirable properties such as lw_modify_all_widgets which is
-called from glyphs-x.c and updates all the properties of a widget
+called from @file{glyphs-x.c} and updates all the properties of a widget
without having to know what the widget is or what toolkit it is from.
-Unfortunately this also has hairy properrties such as making the lwlib
+Unfortunately this also has hairy properties such as making the lwlib
code quite complex. And of course lwlib has to know at some level what
the widget is and how to set its properties.
@c That's all
@bye
-
projects / chise / xemacs-chise.git.1 / blobdiff